Arcosa, Inc. (ACA) vs SPX Technologies, Inc. (SPXC)
A side-by-side comparison of Arcosa, Inc. and SPX Technologies, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 4, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
ACA
Arcosa, Inc.
$146.50Basic MaterialsDelayed quote: Oct 2, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
SPXC
SPX Technologies, Inc.
$173.09Basic MaterialsDelayed quote: Oct 2, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — ACA vs SPXC
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 8yACA +630.4% (+28.2%/yr)SPXC +476.6% (+24.5%/yr)ACA compounded faster over this window
ACA SPXC
ACA vs SPXC: by the numbers
- •SPXC is the larger company ($8.67B vs $7.19B market cap).
- •ACA trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (14.68 vs 31.13 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •ACA converts more revenue to profit (17.90% vs 11.26% net margin).
- •SPXC grew revenue faster over the past five years (13.66% vs 7.59% CAGR).
- •ACA pays a dividend (0.14% yield), while SPXC is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | ACA | SPXC |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 14.68 | 31.13 |
| Forward P/E | 34.23 | 20.66 |
| PEG ratio | 1.03 | 1.65 |
| P/S ratio | 2.62 | 3.50 |
| P/B ratio | 2.41 | 3.69 |
| EV / EBITDA | 13.61 | 17.06 |
| FCF yield | 1.88% | 3.50% |
Profitability
| Metric | ACA | SPXC |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 23.04% | 40.24% |
| Operating margin | 11.83% | 16.29% |
| Net margin | 17.90% | 11.26% |
| ROE | 16.47% | 11.88% |
| ROIC | 5.81% | 9.19% |
Dividends
| Metric | ACA | SPXC |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.14% | N/A |
| Payout ratio | 2.00% | N/A |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | ACA | SPXC |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 7.59% | 13.66% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 14.08% | 18.53% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -0.26% | 12.17% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 23.63% | 25.28% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, ACA or SPXC?
- ACA has the lower trailing P/E: ACA trades at 14.68 and SPXC at 31.13. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, ACA or SPXC?
- Over the past five years, SPXC grew revenue faster — ACA at a 7.59% CAGR versus SPXC at 13.66%.
- Does ACA or SPXC pay a bigger dividend?
- ACA pays a dividend (0.14% yield), while SPXC is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.
- Is ACA or SPXC more profitable?
- ACA runs the higher net margin — ACA at 17.90% versus SPXC at 11.26%.
- How have ACA and SPXC total returns compared?
- Over the past 5 years, ACA delivered 23.63% and SPXC delivered 25.28% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Arcosa P/E ratioSPX Technologies P/E ratioArcosa dividend yieldArcosa ROESPX Technologies ROEArcosa operating marginSPX Technologies operating marginArcosa revenue growthSPX Technologies revenue growthArcosa free cash flowSPX Technologies free cash flow
Arcosa & SPX Technologies appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 4, 2026.