Is ACA or MATX cheaper?

On trailing earnings, MATX is cheaper: ACA trades at a 31.99 P/E and MATX at 14.46.

Which has grown faster, ACA or MATX?

Over the past five years, ACA grew revenue faster — ACA at a 8.38% CAGR versus MATX at 5.17%.

Does ACA or MATX pay a bigger dividend?

ACA yields 0.14% and MATX yields 0.73% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is ACA or MATX more profitable?

MATX runs the higher net margin — ACA at 7.88% versus MATX at 12.92%.

Which has been the better investment, ACA or MATX?

Over the past 5-year, MATX delivered the higher annualized total return — ACA at 20.58% versus MATX at 21.60%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Arcosa, Inc. (ACA) vs Matson, Inc. (MATX)

MATX leads on 13 of 16 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Arcosa, Inc. and Matson, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 23, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Total return — ACA vs MATX

growth of $100 · last 8y

ACA +603.2%MATX +481.5%ACA compounded faster

ACA MATX

ACA vs MATX: by the numbers

•ACA is the larger company ($7.11B vs $5.96B market cap).
•MATX trades at the lower earnings multiple (14.46 vs 31.99 P/E).
•MATX converts more revenue to profit (12.92% vs 7.88% net margin).
•ACA grew revenue faster over the past five years (8.38% vs 5.17% CAGR).
•MATX pays the higher dividend yield (0.73% vs 0.14%).

Which is better, ACA or MATX?

Metric tally: ACA 3 · MATX 13

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueMATX(lower P/E)

GrowthACA(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

IncomeMATX(higher dividend yield)

QualityMATX(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	ACA	MATX
P/E ratio	31.99	14.46●
Forward P/E	33.87	14.08●
P/S ratio	2.53	1.81●
P/B ratio	2.71	2.21●
PEG ratio	0.21●	0.56
EV / EBITDA	15.06	8.46●
FCF yield	3.35%	6.94%●

Profitability

Metric	ACA	MATX
Gross margin	22.77%	22.42%
Operating margin	11.81%	13.50%●
Net margin	7.88%	12.92%●
ROE	8.45%	15.72%●
ROIC	6.71%	8.85%●

Dividends

Metric	ACA	MATX
Dividend yield	0.14%	0.73%●
Payout ratio	4.71%	10.26%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	ACA	MATX
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	8.38%●	5.17%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	14.08%	25.67%●
FCF CAGR (5Y)	11.59%●	7.72%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	20.58%	27.01%●

Frequently asked

Which is better, ACA or MATX?: It depends on your goal. value: MATX (lower P/E); growth: ACA (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: MATX (higher dividend yield); quality: MATX (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, MATX leads 13 to 3.
Is ACA or MATX cheaper?: On trailing earnings, MATX is cheaper: ACA trades at a 31.99 P/E and MATX at 14.46.
Which has grown faster, ACA or MATX?: Over the past five years, ACA grew revenue faster — ACA at a 8.38% CAGR versus MATX at 5.17%.
Does ACA or MATX pay a bigger dividend?: ACA yields 0.14% and MATX yields 0.73% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is ACA or MATX more profitable?: MATX runs the higher net margin — ACA at 7.88% versus MATX at 12.92%.
Which has been the better investment, ACA or MATX?: Over the past 5-year, MATX delivered the higher annualized total return — ACA at 20.58% versus MATX at 21.60%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full ACA analysis Full MATX analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Arcosa P/E ratio Matson P/E ratio Arcosa dividend yield Matson dividend yield Arcosa ROE Matson ROE Arcosa operating margin Matson operating margin Arcosa revenue growth Matson revenue growth Arcosa free cash flow Matson free cash flow

Arcosa & Matson appear in these rankings

Highest FCF Yield Stocks Best 10-Year Total Return Stocks Lowest P/E Ratio Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 23, 2026.