Is ACA or FLR cheaper?

On trailing earnings, FLR is cheaper: ACA trades at a 31.86 P/E and FLR at 27.22.

Which has grown faster, ACA or FLR?

Over the past five years, ACA grew revenue faster — ACA at a 8.38% CAGR versus FLR at 1.92%.

Does ACA or FLR pay a bigger dividend?

ACA pays a dividend (0.14% yield) while FLR does not currently pay one.

Is ACA or FLR more profitable?

ACA runs the higher net margin — ACA at 7.88% versus FLR at 2.30%.

Which has been the better investment, ACA or FLR?

Over the past 5-year, ACA delivered the higher annualized total return — ACA at 19.79% versus FLR at 1.81%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Arcosa, Inc. (ACA) vs Fluor Corporation (FLR)

ACA leads on 8 of 14 compared metrics, though FLR is the cheaper stock.

A side-by-side comparison of Arcosa, Inc. and Fluor Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 25, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Total return — ACA vs FLR

growth of $100 · last 8y

ACA +600.1%FLR +23.5%ACA compounded faster

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

ACA FLR

ACA vs FLR: by the numbers

•FLR is the larger company ($7.49B vs $7.08B market cap).
•FLR trades at the lower earnings multiple (27.22 vs 31.86 P/E).
•ACA converts more revenue to profit (7.88% vs 2.30% net margin).
•ACA grew revenue faster over the past five years (8.38% vs 1.92% CAGR).
•ACA pays a dividend (0.14% yield) while FLR does not currently pay one.

Which is better, ACA or FLR?

Metric tally: ACA 8 · FLR 6

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueFLR(lower P/E)

GrowthACA(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityACA(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	ACA	FLR
P/E ratio	31.86	27.22●
Forward P/E	33.74	20.67●
P/S ratio	2.52	0.62●
P/B ratio	2.70●	3.29
PEG ratio	0.21●	1.25
EV / EBITDA	15.01	—
FCF yield	3.36%	—

Profitability

Metric	ACA	FLR
Gross margin	22.77%●	-1.63%
Operating margin	11.81%●	-3.40%
Net margin	7.88%●	2.30%
ROE	8.45%	12.19%●
ROIC	6.71%●	1.84%

Dividends

Metric	ACA	FLR
Dividend yield	0.14%	—
Payout ratio	4.71%	—

Growth (annualized)

Metric	ACA	FLR
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	8.38%●	1.92%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	14.08%	40.81%●
FCF CAGR (5Y)	11.59%●	6.28%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	19.79%	23.65%●

Frequently asked

Which is better, ACA or FLR?: It depends on your goal. value: FLR (lower P/E); growth: ACA (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: ACA (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, ACA leads 8 to 6.
Is ACA or FLR cheaper?: On trailing earnings, FLR is cheaper: ACA trades at a 31.86 P/E and FLR at 27.22.
Which has grown faster, ACA or FLR?: Over the past five years, ACA grew revenue faster — ACA at a 8.38% CAGR versus FLR at 1.92%.
Does ACA or FLR pay a bigger dividend?: ACA pays a dividend (0.14% yield) while FLR does not currently pay one.
Is ACA or FLR more profitable?: ACA runs the higher net margin — ACA at 7.88% versus FLR at 2.30%.
Which has been the better investment, ACA or FLR?: Over the past 5-year, ACA delivered the higher annualized total return — ACA at 19.79% versus FLR at 1.81%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full ACA analysis Full FLR analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Arcosa P/E ratio Fluor P/E ratio Arcosa dividend yield Fluor dividend yield Arcosa ROE Fluor ROE Arcosa operating margin Fluor operating margin Arcosa revenue growth Fluor revenue growth Arcosa free cash flow Fluor free cash flow

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 25, 2026.