Which has the lower trailing P/E, ACA or ENS?

ACA has the lower trailing P/E: ACA trades at 16.19 and ENS at 24.31. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, ACA or ENS?

Over the past five years, ACA grew revenue faster — ACA at a 7.59% CAGR versus ENS at 4.73%.

Does ACA or ENS pay a bigger dividend?

ACA yields 0.14% and ENS yields 0.56% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is ACA or ENS more profitable?

ACA runs the higher net margin — ACA at 17.90% versus ENS at 7.82%.

How have ACA and ENS total returns compared?

Over the past 5 years, ACA delivered 23.39% and ENS delivered 12.25% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Arcosa, Inc. (ACA) vs EnerSys (ENS)

A side-by-side comparison of Arcosa, Inc. and EnerSys across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of August 7, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

ACA

Arcosa, Inc.

$7.12B

$144.95IndustrialsDelayed quote: Aug 7, 2026, 2:14 PM EDT

ENS

EnerSys

$7.00B

$192.09IndustrialsDelayed quote: Aug 7, 2026, 2:15 PM EDT

Total return — ACA vs ENS

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 8y

ACA +622.3%ENS +175.6%ACA compounded faster

ACA ENS

ACA vs ENS: by the numbers

•ACA is the larger company ($7.12B vs $7.00B market cap).
•ACA trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (16.19 vs 24.31 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•ACA converts more revenue to profit (17.90% vs 7.82% net margin).
•ACA grew revenue faster over the past five years (7.59% vs 4.73% CAGR).
•ENS pays the higher dividend yield (0.56% vs 0.14%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	ACA	ENS
P/E ratio	16.19	24.31
Forward P/E	33.87	18.12
P/S ratio	2.60	1.91
P/B ratio	2.40	3.75
PEG ratio	0.21	1.32
EV / EBITDA	18.17	14.14
FCF yield	1.51%	6.54%

Profitability

Metric	ACA	ENS
Gross margin	23.04%	29.26%
Operating margin	8.11%	11.87%
Net margin	17.90%	7.82%
ROE	16.57%	15.40%
ROIC	6.71%	12.37%

Dividends

Metric	ACA	ENS
Dividend yield	0.14%	0.56%
Payout ratio	4.71%	13.39%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	ACA	ENS
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	7.59%	4.73%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	14.08%	18.40%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	-0.51%	10.15%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	23.39%	14.89%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, ACA or ENS?: ACA has the lower trailing P/E: ACA trades at 16.19 and ENS at 24.31. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, ACA or ENS?: Over the past five years, ACA grew revenue faster — ACA at a 7.59% CAGR versus ENS at 4.73%.
Does ACA or ENS pay a bigger dividend?: ACA yields 0.14% and ENS yields 0.56% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is ACA or ENS more profitable?: ACA runs the higher net margin — ACA at 17.90% versus ENS at 7.82%.
How have ACA and ENS total returns compared?: Over the past 5 years, ACA delivered 23.39% and ENS delivered 12.25% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full ACA analysis Full ENS analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Arcosa P/E ratio EnerSys P/E ratio Arcosa dividend yield EnerSys dividend yield Arcosa ROE EnerSys ROE Arcosa operating margin EnerSys operating margin Arcosa revenue growth EnerSys revenue growth Arcosa free cash flow EnerSys free cash flow

Arcosa & EnerSys appear in these rankings

Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified August 7, 2026.