Is ACA or ENS cheaper?

On trailing earnings, ENS is cheaper: ACA trades at a 31.99 P/E and ENS at 30.21.

Which has grown faster, ACA or ENS?

Over the past five years, ACA grew revenue faster — ACA at a 8.38% CAGR versus ENS at 4.73%.

Does ACA or ENS pay a bigger dividend?

ACA yields 0.14% and ENS yields 0.45% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Which has been the better investment, ACA or ENS?

Over the past 5-year, ACA delivered the higher annualized total return — ACA at 20.58% versus ENS at 15.16%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Arcosa, Inc. (ACA) vs EnerSys (ENS)

ENS leads on 9 of 14 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Arcosa, Inc. and EnerSys across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 23, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Total return — ACA vs ENS

growth of $100 · last 8y

ACA +603.2%ENS +218.4%ACA compounded faster

ACA ENS

ACA vs ENS: by the numbers

•ENS is the larger company ($8.51B vs $7.11B market cap).
•ENS trades at the lower earnings multiple (30.21 vs 31.99 P/E).
•ACA grew revenue faster over the past five years (8.38% vs 4.73% CAGR).
•ENS pays the higher dividend yield (0.45% vs 0.14%).

Which is better, ACA or ENS?

Metric tally: ACA 5 · ENS 9

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueENS(lower P/E)

GrowthACA(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityENS(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	ACA	ENS
P/E ratio	31.99	30.21●
Forward P/E	33.87	22.52●
P/S ratio	2.53	2.37●
P/B ratio	2.71●	4.66
PEG ratio	0.21●	0.26
EV / EBITDA	15.06●	18.84
FCF yield	3.35%	5.26%●

Profitability

Metric	ACA	ENS
Gross margin	22.77%	29.26%●
Operating margin	11.81%	11.87%
Net margin	7.88%	7.82%
ROE	8.45%	15.40%●
ROIC	6.71%	12.37%●

Dividends

Metric	ACA	ENS
Dividend yield	0.14%	0.45%●
Payout ratio	4.71%	13.39%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	ACA	ENS
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	8.38%●	4.73%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	14.08%	18.40%●
FCF CAGR (5Y)	11.59%●	10.15%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	20.58%	20.69%

Frequently asked

Which is better, ACA or ENS?: It depends on your goal. value: ENS (lower P/E); growth: ACA (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: ENS (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, ENS leads 9 to 5.
Is ACA or ENS cheaper?: On trailing earnings, ENS is cheaper: ACA trades at a 31.99 P/E and ENS at 30.21.
Which has grown faster, ACA or ENS?: Over the past five years, ACA grew revenue faster — ACA at a 8.38% CAGR versus ENS at 4.73%.
Does ACA or ENS pay a bigger dividend?: ACA yields 0.14% and ENS yields 0.45% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Which has been the better investment, ACA or ENS?: Over the past 5-year, ACA delivered the higher annualized total return — ACA at 20.58% versus ENS at 15.16%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full ACA analysis Full ENS analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Arcosa P/E ratio EnerSys P/E ratio Arcosa dividend yield EnerSys dividend yield Arcosa ROE EnerSys ROE Arcosa operating margin EnerSys operating margin Arcosa revenue growth EnerSys revenue growth Arcosa free cash flow EnerSys free cash flow

Arcosa & EnerSys appear in these rankings

Highest FCF Yield Stocks Best 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 23, 2026.