Arcosa, Inc. (ACA) vs A. O. Smith Corporation (AOS)
AOS leads on 11 of 17 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Arcosa, Inc. and A. O. Smith Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 24, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
Total return — ACA vs AOS
growth of $100 · last 8yACA +603.3%AOS +35.9%ACA compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
ACA AOS
ACA vs AOS: by the numbers
- •AOS is the larger company ($8.02B vs $7.09B market cap).
- •AOS trades at the lower earnings multiple (15.28 vs 31.99 P/E).
- •AOS converts more revenue to profit (13.84% vs 7.88% net margin).
- •ACA grew revenue faster over the past five years (8.38% vs 4.72% CAGR).
- •AOS pays the higher dividend yield (2.47% vs 0.14%).
Which is better, ACA or AOS?
Metric tally: ACA 6 · AOS 11It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueAOS(lower P/E)
GrowthACA(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeAOS(higher dividend yield)
QualityAOS(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | ACA | AOS |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 31.99 | 15.28● |
| Forward P/E | 33.87 | 15.20● |
| P/S ratio | 2.53 | 2.10● |
| P/B ratio | 2.71● | 4.26 |
| PEG ratio | 0.21● | 3.01 |
| EV / EBITDA | 15.06 | 10.65● |
| FCF yield | 3.35% | 8.10%● |
Profitability
| Metric | ACA | AOS |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 22.77% | 38.77%● |
| Operating margin | 11.81% | 18.55%● |
| Net margin | 7.88% | 13.84%● |
| ROE | 8.45% | 28.10%● |
| ROIC | 6.71% | 23.94%● |
Dividends
| Metric | ACA | AOS |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.14% | 2.47%● |
| Payout ratio | 4.71% | 36.79% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | ACA | AOS |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 8.38%● | 4.72% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 14.08%● | 12.52% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 11.59%● | 3.27% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 19.65%● | -1.58% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, ACA or AOS?
- It depends on your goal. value: AOS (lower P/E); growth: ACA (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: AOS (higher dividend yield); quality: AOS (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, AOS leads 11 to 6.
- Is ACA or AOS cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, AOS is cheaper: ACA trades at a 31.99 P/E and AOS at 15.28.
- Which has grown faster, ACA or AOS?
- Over the past five years, ACA grew revenue faster — ACA at a 8.38% CAGR versus AOS at 4.72%.
- Does ACA or AOS pay a bigger dividend?
- ACA yields 0.14% and AOS yields 2.47% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is ACA or AOS more profitable?
- AOS runs the higher net margin — ACA at 7.88% versus AOS at 13.84%.
- Which has been the better investment, ACA or AOS?
- Over the past 5-year, ACA delivered the higher annualized total return — ACA at 19.65% versus AOS at 4.60%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Arcosa P/E ratioA. O. Smith P/E ratioArcosa dividend yieldA. O. Smith dividend yieldArcosa ROEA. O. Smith ROEArcosa operating marginA. O. Smith operating marginArcosa revenue growthA. O. Smith revenue growthArcosa free cash flowA. O. Smith free cash flow
Arcosa & A. O. Smith appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 24, 2026.