Abbott Laboratories (ABT) vs Gilead Sciences, Inc. (GILD)
A side-by-side comparison of Abbott Laboratories and Gilead Sciences, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 28, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
ABT
Abbott Laboratories
$107.32HealthcareDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
GILD
Gilead Sciences, Inc.
$134.32HealthcareDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — ABT vs GILD
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 30yABT +1921.4%GILD +32063.7%GILD compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
ABT GILD
ABT vs GILD: by the numbers
- •ABT is the larger company ($186.93B vs $166.77B market cap).
- •GILD trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (17.78 vs 33.60 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •GILD converts more revenue to profit (30.99% vs 11.65% net margin).
- •GILD pays the higher dividend yield (2.47% vs 2.34%).
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | ABT | GILD |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 33.60 | 17.78 |
| Forward P/E | 18.96 | N/A |
| P/S ratio | 3.91 | 5.50 |
| P/B ratio | 3.51 | 6.96 |
| PEG ratio | 4.09 | 0.01 |
| EV / EBITDA | 21.21 | 12.61 |
| FCF yield | 4.04% | 6.25% |
Profitability
| Metric | ABT | GILD |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 56.80% | 79.35% |
| Operating margin | 17.03% | 38.26% |
| Net margin | 11.65% | 30.99% |
| ROE | 10.42% | 39.19% |
| ROIC | 8.43% | 21.53% |
Dividends
| Metric | ABT | GILD |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 2.34% | 2.47% |
| Payout ratio | 65.24% | 47.08% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | ABT | GILD |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 2.98% | 3.07% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 8.22% | 133.83% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 5.26% | 3.30% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -0.78% | 18.02% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, ABT or GILD?
- GILD has the lower trailing P/E: ABT trades at 33.60 and GILD at 17.78. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, ABT or GILD?
- Over the past five years, GILD grew revenue faster — ABT at a 2.98% CAGR versus GILD at 3.07%.
- Does ABT or GILD pay a bigger dividend?
- ABT yields 2.34% and GILD yields 2.47% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is ABT or GILD more profitable?
- GILD runs the higher net margin — ABT at 11.65% versus GILD at 30.99%.
- How have ABT and GILD total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, ABT delivered 11.19% and GILD delivered 8.90% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Abbott Laboratories P/E ratioGilead Sciences P/E ratioAbbott Laboratories dividend yieldGilead Sciences dividend yieldAbbott Laboratories ROEGilead Sciences ROEAbbott Laboratories operating marginGilead Sciences operating marginAbbott Laboratories revenue growthGilead Sciences revenue growthAbbott Laboratories free cash flowGilead Sciences free cash flow
Abbott Laboratories & Gilead Sciences appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 28, 2026.