Abbott Laboratories (ABT) vs Gilead Sciences, Inc. (GILD)
GILD leads on 13 of 17 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Abbott Laboratories and Gilead Sciences, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 13, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
Total return — ABT vs GILD
growth of $100 · last 30yABT +804.4%GILD +13408.8%GILD compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
ABT GILD
ABT vs GILD: by the numbers
- •GILD is the larger company ($155.93B vs $153.59B market cap).
- •GILD trades at the lower earnings multiple (17.11 vs 24.56 P/E).
- •GILD converts more revenue to profit (30.99% vs 13.91% net margin).
- •ABT grew revenue faster over the past five years (3.87% vs 3.07% CAGR).
- •ABT pays the higher dividend yield (2.77% vs 1.91%).
Which is better, ABT or GILD?
Metric tally: ABT 4 · GILD 13It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueGILD(lower P/E)
GrowthABT(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeABT(higher dividend yield)
QualityGILD(higher ROIC)
Valuation
| Metric | ABT | GILD |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 24.56 | 17.11● |
| Forward P/E | 14.56 | 13.00● |
| P/S ratio | 3.41● | 5.30 |
| P/B ratio | 2.96● | 6.70 |
| PEG ratio | 2.99 | 0.01● |
| EV / EBITDA | 17.30 | 12.91● |
| FCF yield | 4.79% | 6.49%● |
Profitability
| Metric | ABT | GILD |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 56.38% | 79.35%● |
| Operating margin | 18.17% | 38.26%● |
| Net margin | 13.91% | 30.99%● |
| ROE | 12.06% | 39.19%● |
| ROIC | 8.43% | 21.53%● |
Dividends
| Metric | ABT | GILD |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 2.77%● | 1.91% |
| Payout ratio | 65.24% | 35.09% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | ABT | GILD |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 3.87%● | 3.07% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 8.22% | 133.83%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -0.61% | 3.30%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -2.49% | 17.06%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, ABT or GILD?
- It depends on your goal. value: GILD (lower P/E); growth: ABT (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: ABT (higher dividend yield); quality: GILD (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, GILD leads 13 to 4.
- Is ABT or GILD cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, GILD is cheaper: ABT trades at a 24.56 P/E and GILD at 17.11.
- Which has grown faster, ABT or GILD?
- Over the past five years, ABT grew revenue faster — ABT at a 3.87% CAGR versus GILD at 3.07%.
- Does ABT or GILD pay a bigger dividend?
- ABT yields 2.77% and GILD yields 1.91% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is ABT or GILD more profitable?
- GILD runs the higher net margin — ABT at 13.91% versus GILD at 30.99%.
- Which has been the better investment, ABT or GILD?
- Over the past 10-year, ABT delivered the higher annualized total return — ABT at 10.72% versus GILD at 7.79%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Abbott Laboratories P/E ratioGilead Sciences P/E ratioAbbott Laboratories dividend yieldGilead Sciences dividend yieldAbbott Laboratories ROEGilead Sciences ROEAbbott Laboratories operating marginGilead Sciences operating marginAbbott Laboratories revenue growthGilead Sciences revenue growthAbbott Laboratories free cash flowGilead Sciences free cash flow
Abbott Laboratories & Gilead Sciences appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 13, 2026.