Abbott Laboratories (ABT) vs Danaher Corporation (DHR)
ABT leads on 12 of 17 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Abbott Laboratories and Danaher Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 14, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
Total return — ABT vs DHR
growth of $100 · last 30yABT +814.7%DHR +5120.3%DHR compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
ABT DHR
ABT vs DHR: by the numbers
- •ABT is the larger company ($153.59B vs $127.47B market cap).
- •ABT trades at the lower earnings multiple (24.56 vs 34.84 P/E).
- •DHR converts more revenue to profit (14.89% vs 13.91% net margin).
- •ABT grew revenue faster over the past five years (3.87% vs 2.05% CAGR).
- •ABT pays the higher dividend yield (2.77% vs 0.76%).
Which is better, ABT or DHR?
Metric tally: ABT 12 · DHR 5It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueABT(lower P/E)
GrowthABT(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeABT(higher dividend yield)
QualityABT(higher ROIC)
Valuation
| Metric | ABT | DHR |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 24.56● | 34.84 |
| Forward P/E | 14.56● | 19.73 |
| P/S ratio | 3.41● | 5.17 |
| P/B ratio | 2.96 | 2.42● |
| PEG ratio | 2.99● | 87.09 |
| EV / EBITDA | 17.30● | 21.20 |
| FCF yield | 4.79%● | 4.13% |
Profitability
| Metric | ABT | DHR |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 56.38% | 60.68%● |
| Operating margin | 18.17% | 20.95%● |
| Net margin | 13.91% | 14.89%● |
| ROE | 12.06%● | 6.97% |
| ROIC | 8.43%● | 5.72% |
Dividends
| Metric | ABT | DHR |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 2.77%● | 0.76% |
| Payout ratio | 65.24% | 26.82% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | ABT | DHR |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 3.87%● | 2.05% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 8.22%● | 0.40% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -0.61% | -0.45%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -2.49%● | -3.38% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, ABT or DHR?
- It depends on your goal. value: ABT (lower P/E); growth: ABT (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: ABT (higher dividend yield); quality: ABT (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, ABT leads 12 to 5.
- Is ABT or DHR cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, ABT is cheaper: ABT trades at a 24.56 P/E and DHR at 34.84.
- Which has grown faster, ABT or DHR?
- Over the past five years, ABT grew revenue faster — ABT at a 3.87% CAGR versus DHR at 2.05%.
- Does ABT or DHR pay a bigger dividend?
- ABT yields 2.77% and DHR yields 0.76% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is ABT or DHR more profitable?
- DHR runs the higher net margin — ABT at 13.91% versus DHR at 14.89%.
- Which has been the better investment, ABT or DHR?
- Over the past 10-year, DHR delivered the higher annualized total return — ABT at 10.72% versus DHR at 10.98%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Abbott Laboratories P/E ratioDanaher P/E ratioAbbott Laboratories dividend yieldDanaher dividend yieldAbbott Laboratories ROEDanaher ROEAbbott Laboratories operating marginDanaher operating marginAbbott Laboratories revenue growthDanaher revenue growthAbbott Laboratories free cash flowDanaher free cash flow
Abbott Laboratories & Danaher appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 14, 2026.