Abbott Laboratories (ABT) vs AstraZeneca PLC (AZN)
A side-by-side comparison of Abbott Laboratories and AstraZeneca PLC across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 13, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
ABT
Abbott Laboratories
$102.05HealthcareDelayed quote: Sep 15, 2026, 3:59 PM EDT
AZN
AstraZeneca PLC
$161.85HealthcareDelayed quote: Sep 15, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — ABT vs AZN
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yABT +195.2% (+11.4%/yr)AZN +218.1% (+12.3%/yr)AZN compounded faster over this window
ABT AZN
ABT vs AZN: by the numbers
- •AZN is the larger company ($251.01B vs $176.59B market cap).
- •AZN trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (24.30 vs 32.81 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •AZN converts more revenue to profit (17.02% vs 11.65% net margin).
- •AZN grew revenue faster over the past five years (15.76% vs 2.98% CAGR).
- •ABT pays the higher dividend yield (2.43% vs 2.02%).
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | ABT | AZN |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 32.81 | 24.30 |
| Forward P/E | 18.50 | 15.80 |
| P/S ratio | 3.79 | 4.09 |
| P/B ratio | 3.46 | 5.00 |
| EV / EBITDA | 18.74 | 13.69 |
| FCF yield | 4.49% | 3.48% |
Profitability
| Metric | ABT | AZN |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 56.80% | 81.88% |
| Operating margin | 17.03% | 22.77% |
| Net margin | 11.65% | 17.02% |
| ROE | 10.61% | 20.79% |
| ROIC | 6.07% | 12.83% |
Dividends
| Metric | ABT | AZN |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 2.43% | 2.02% |
| Payout ratio | 79.74% | 48.50% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | ABT | AZN |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 2.98% | 15.76% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 8.22% | 22.02% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 0.18% | 14.53% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -2.69% | 9.52% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, ABT or AZN?
- AZN has the lower trailing P/E: ABT trades at 32.81 and AZN at 24.30. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, ABT or AZN?
- Over the past five years, AZN grew revenue faster — ABT at a 2.98% CAGR versus AZN at 15.76%.
- Does ABT or AZN pay a bigger dividend?
- ABT yields 2.43% and AZN yields 2.02% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is ABT or AZN more profitable?
- AZN runs the higher net margin — ABT at 11.65% versus AZN at 17.02%.
- How have ABT and AZN total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, ABT delivered 11.61% and AZN delivered 12.88% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Abbott Laboratories P/E ratioAstraZeneca P/E ratioAbbott Laboratories dividend yieldAstraZeneca dividend yieldAbbott Laboratories ROEAstraZeneca ROEAbbott Laboratories operating marginAstraZeneca operating marginAbbott Laboratories revenue growthAstraZeneca revenue growthAbbott Laboratories free cash flowAstraZeneca free cash flow
Abbott Laboratories & AstraZeneca appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 13, 2026.