Abbott Laboratories (ABT) vs AstraZeneca PLC (AZN)
A side-by-side comparison of Abbott Laboratories and AstraZeneca PLC across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 31, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
ABT
Abbott Laboratories
$105.70HealthcareDelayed quote: Jul 31, 2026, 4:02 PM EDT
AZN
AstraZeneca PLC
$169.64HealthcareDelayed quote: Jul 31, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — ABT vs AZN
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 30yABT +1948.2%AZN +2029.9%AZN compounded faster
ABT AZN
ABT vs AZN: by the numbers
- •ABT is the larger company ($184.11B vs $131.47B market cap).
- •AZN trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (12.77 vs 33.96 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •AZN converts more revenue to profit (17.19% vs 11.65% net margin).
- •AZN grew revenue faster over the past five years (16.99% vs 2.98% CAGR).
- •ABT pays the higher dividend yield (2.31% vs 1.89%).
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | ABT | AZN |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 33.96 | 12.77 |
| Forward P/E | 19.15 | 16.55 |
| P/S ratio | 3.95 | 2.19 |
| P/B ratio | 3.54 | 2.80 |
| PEG ratio | 4.13 | 0.29 |
| EV / EBITDA | 21.37 | 7.89 |
| FCF yield | 4.00% | 6.09% |
Profitability
| Metric | ABT | AZN |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 56.80% | 81.68% |
| Operating margin | 17.03% | 23.69% |
| Net margin | 11.65% | 17.19% |
| ROE | 10.42% | 21.95% |
| ROIC | 8.43% | 13.03% |
Dividends
| Metric | ABT | AZN |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 2.31% | 1.89% |
| Payout ratio | 65.24% | 24.24% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | ABT | AZN |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 2.98% | 16.99% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 8.22% | 22.02% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 5.26% | 15.68% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -0.78% | 10.60% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, ABT or AZN?
- AZN has the lower trailing P/E: ABT trades at 33.96 and AZN at 12.77. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, ABT or AZN?
- Over the past five years, AZN grew revenue faster — ABT at a 2.98% CAGR versus AZN at 16.99%.
- Does ABT or AZN pay a bigger dividend?
- ABT yields 2.31% and AZN yields 1.89% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is ABT or AZN more profitable?
- AZN runs the higher net margin — ABT at 11.65% versus AZN at 17.19%.
- How have ABT and AZN total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, ABT delivered 11.02% and AZN delivered 13.02% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Abbott Laboratories P/E ratioAstraZeneca P/E ratioAbbott Laboratories dividend yieldAstraZeneca dividend yieldAbbott Laboratories ROEAstraZeneca ROEAbbott Laboratories operating marginAstraZeneca operating marginAbbott Laboratories revenue growthAstraZeneca revenue growthAbbott Laboratories free cash flowAstraZeneca free cash flow
Abbott Laboratories & AstraZeneca appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 31, 2026.