Cambium Learning Group, Inc. (ABCD) vs Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST)

A side-by-side comparison of Cambium Learning Group, Inc. and Costco Wholesale Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 28, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Compare

Total returnABCD vs COST

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 9y
ABCD +296.7%COST +245.8%ABCD compounded faster
0100200300400Start $1002011201320152017$397$346
ABCD COST

ABCD vs COST: by the numbers

  • ABCD trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (16.09 vs 48.62 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
  • ABCD converts more revenue to profit (26.87% vs 3.01% net margin).
  • COST grew revenue faster over the past five years (9.48% vs 1.18% CAGR).
  • COST pays a dividend (0.56% yield), while ABCD has no payments in the available dividend history.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

MetricABCDCOST
P/E ratio16.0948.62
Forward P/EN/A47.06
P/S ratio4.371.46
P/B ratioN/A12.82
PEG ratio0.025.23
EV / EBITDA17.7130.37
FCF yield5.78%2.05%

Profitability

MetricABCDCOST
Gross margin72.00%12.88%
Operating margin12.93%3.82%
Net margin26.87%3.01%
ROE-315.25%26.38%
ROIC52.46%19.44%

Dividends

MetricABCDCOST
Dividend yieldN/A0.56%
Payout ratioN/A29.44%

Growth (annualized)

MetricABCDCOST
Revenue CAGR (5Y)1.18%9.48%
EPS CAGR (5Y)N/A15.04%
FCF CAGR (5Y)13.57%4.95%
Total return CAGR (5Y)52.20%18.80%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, ABCD or COST?
ABCD has the lower trailing P/E: ABCD trades at 16.09 and COST at 48.62. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, ABCD or COST?
Over the past five years, COST grew revenue faster — ABCD at a 1.18% CAGR versus COST at 9.48%.
Does ABCD or COST pay a bigger dividend?
COST pays a dividend (0.56% yield), while ABCD has no payments in the available dividend history.
Is ABCD or COST more profitable?
ABCD runs the higher net margin — ABCD at 26.87% versus COST at 3.01%.
How have ABCD and COST total returns compared?
Over the past 5 years, ABCD delivered 52.20% and COST delivered 20.24% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 28, 2026.