AbbVie Inc. (ABBV) vs Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. (TMO)
ABBV and TMO are evenly matched — 7 metrics each of 14.
A side-by-side comparison of AbbVie Inc. and Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 14, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
Total return — ABBV vs TMO
growth of $100 · last 14yABBV +550.7%TMO +624.5%TMO compounded faster
ABBV TMO
ABBV vs TMO: by the numbers
- •ABBV is the larger company ($402.35B vs $174.42B market cap).
- •TMO trades at the lower earnings multiple (25.80 vs 111.67 P/E).
- •TMO converts more revenue to profit (15.18% vs 5.79% net margin).
- •TMO grew revenue faster over the past five years (6.68% vs 4.59% CAGR).
- •ABBV pays the higher dividend yield (2.96% vs 0.28%).
Which is better, ABBV or TMO?
Metric tally: ABBV 7 · TMO 7It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueTMO(lower P/E)
GrowthTMO(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeABBV(higher dividend yield)
QualityABBV(higher ROIC)
Valuation
| Metric | ABBV | TMO |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 111.67 | 25.80● |
| Forward P/E | — | 17.26 |
| P/S ratio | 6.43 | 3.87● |
| P/B ratio | 14.69 | 3.37● |
| PEG ratio | — | 4.51 |
| EV / EBITDA | 27.63 | 19.26● |
| FCF yield | 5.17%● | 3.86% |
Profitability
| Metric | ABBV | TMO |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 70.68%● | 39.41% |
| Operating margin | 27.60%● | 17.76% |
| Net margin | 5.79% | 15.18%● |
| ROE | 13.23% | 13.21% |
| ROIC | 12.97%● | 7.58% |
Dividends
| Metric | ABBV | TMO |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 2.96%● | 0.28% |
| Payout ratio | 284.39% | 7.48% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | ABBV | TMO |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 4.59% | 6.68%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -2.79% | 1.99%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 3.24%● | -0.19% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 18.95%● | 0.45% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, ABBV or TMO?
- It depends on your goal. value: TMO (lower P/E); growth: TMO (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: ABBV (higher dividend yield); quality: ABBV (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, they are evenly matched.
- Is ABBV or TMO cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, TMO is cheaper: ABBV trades at a 111.67 P/E and TMO at 25.80.
- Which has grown faster, ABBV or TMO?
- Over the past five years, TMO grew revenue faster — ABBV at a 4.59% CAGR versus TMO at 6.68%.
- Does ABBV or TMO pay a bigger dividend?
- ABBV yields 2.96% and TMO yields 0.28% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is ABBV or TMO more profitable?
- TMO runs the higher net margin — ABBV at 5.79% versus TMO at 15.18%.
- Which has been the better investment, ABBV or TMO?
- Over the past 10-year, ABBV delivered the higher annualized total return — ABBV at 18.88% versus TMO at 12.26%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
AbbVie P/E ratioThermo Fisher Scientific P/E ratioAbbVie dividend yieldThermo Fisher Scientific dividend yieldAbbVie ROEThermo Fisher Scientific ROEAbbVie operating marginThermo Fisher Scientific operating marginAbbVie revenue growthThermo Fisher Scientific revenue growthAbbVie free cash flowThermo Fisher Scientific free cash flow
AbbVie & Thermo Fisher Scientific appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 14, 2026.