American Battery Technology Company Common Stock (ABAT) vs Information Services Group, Inc. (III)
A side-by-side comparison of American Battery Technology Company Common Stock and Information Services Group, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
ABAT
American Battery Technology Company Common Stock
$2.19IndustrialsDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 10:05 AM EDT
III
Information Services Group, Inc.
$5.75IndustrialsDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 10:05 AM EDT
Total return — ABAT vs III
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yABAT -66.4% (-10.3%/yr)III +82.7% (+6.2%/yr)III compounded faster over this window
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
ABAT III
ABAT vs III: by the numbers
- •ABAT is the larger company ($299M vs $275M market cap).
- •III is profitable (4.67% net margin) while ABAT runs a net loss (-337.50%).
- •III pays a dividend (3.09% yield), while ABAT has no payments in the available dividend history.
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | ABAT | III |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | N/A | 24.31 |
| Forward P/E | N/A | 23.96 |
| PEG ratio | N/A | 0.94 |
| P/S ratio | 13.74 | 1.10 |
| P/B ratio | 2.36 | 2.87 |
| EV / EBITDA | N/A | 12.52 |
| FCF yield | N/A | 3.51% |
Profitability
| Metric | ABAT | III |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | -29.92% | 42.15% |
| Operating margin | -343.62% | 8.43% |
| Net margin | -337.50% | 4.67% |
| ROE | -58.06% | 12.19% |
| ROIC | -59.08% | 7.89% |
Dividends
| Metric | ABAT | III |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | N/A | 3.09% |
| Payout ratio | N/A | 76.11% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | ABAT | III |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | N/A | -1.15% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | N/A | 25.93% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | N/A | -23.22% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -37.53% | -0.86% |
Frequently asked
- Does ABAT or III pay a bigger dividend?
- III pays a dividend (3.09% yield), while ABAT has no payments in the available dividend history.
- Is ABAT or III more profitable?
- III runs the higher net margin — ABAT at -337.50% versus III at 4.67%.
- How have ABAT and III total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, ABAT delivered -10.32% and III delivered 6.21% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Information Services P/E ratioInformation Services dividend yieldAmerican Battery Technology Company Common Stock ROEInformation Services ROEAmerican Battery Technology Company Common Stock operating marginInformation Services operating marginAmerican Battery Technology Company Common Stock revenue growthInformation Services revenue growthAmerican Battery Technology Company Common Stock free cash flowInformation Services free cash flow
American Battery Technology Company Common Stock & Information Services appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.