Advance Auto Parts, Inc. (AAP) vs Vail Resorts, Inc. (MTN)
MTN leads on 11 of 15 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Advance Auto Parts, Inc. and Vail Resorts, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 22, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
AAP
Advance Auto Parts, Inc.
$55.49Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Jul 22, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
MTN
Vail Resorts, Inc.
$144.93Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Jul 22, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — AAP vs MTN
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 25yAAP +384.7%MTN +1116.9%MTN compounded faster
AAP MTN
AAP vs MTN: by the numbers
- •MTN is the larger company ($5.16B vs $3.35B market cap).
- •MTN trades at the lower earnings multiple (34.04 vs 77.06 P/E).
- •MTN converts more revenue to profit (6.29% vs 0.51% net margin).
- •MTN grew revenue faster over the past five years (9.70% vs -4.27% CAGR).
- •MTN pays the higher dividend yield (6.02% vs 1.80%).
Which is better, AAP or MTN?
Metric tally: AAP 4 · MTN 11It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueMTN(lower P/E)
GrowthMTN(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeMTN(higher dividend yield)
QualityMTN(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | AAP | MTN |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 77.06 | 34.04● |
| Forward P/E | 30.63● | 34.07 |
| P/S ratio | 0.39● | 1.87 |
| P/B ratio | 1.53● | 9.59 |
| PEG ratio | — | 0.83 |
| EV / EBITDA | 10.68 | 8.30● |
| FCF yield | — | 4.49% |
Profitability
| Metric | AAP | MTN |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 44.04%● | 42.78% |
| Operating margin | 3.16% | 24.13%● |
| Net margin | 0.51% | 6.29%● |
| ROE | 1.99% | 32.27%● |
| ROIC | -1.57% | 8.74%● |
Dividends
| Metric | AAP | MTN |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 1.80% | 6.02%● |
| Payout ratio | 136.99% | 117.77% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | AAP | MTN |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | -4.27% | 9.70%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -36.67% | 25.21%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -16.51% | 7.51%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -21.33% | -10.41%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, AAP or MTN?
- It depends on your goal. value: MTN (lower P/E); growth: MTN (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: MTN (higher dividend yield); quality: MTN (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, MTN leads 11 to 4.
- Is AAP or MTN cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, MTN is cheaper: AAP trades at a 77.06 P/E and MTN at 34.04.
- Which has grown faster, AAP or MTN?
- Over the past five years, MTN grew revenue faster — AAP at a -4.27% CAGR versus MTN at 9.70%.
- Does AAP or MTN pay a bigger dividend?
- AAP yields 1.80% and MTN yields 6.02% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is AAP or MTN more profitable?
- MTN runs the higher net margin — AAP at 0.51% versus MTN at 6.29%.
- Which has been the better investment, AAP or MTN?
- Over the past 10-year, MTN delivered the higher annualized total return — AAP at -9.03% versus MTN at 3.20%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Advance Auto Parts P/E ratioVail Resorts P/E ratioAdvance Auto Parts dividend yieldVail Resorts dividend yieldAdvance Auto Parts ROEVail Resorts ROEAdvance Auto Parts operating marginVail Resorts operating marginAdvance Auto Parts revenue growthVail Resorts revenue growthAdvance Auto Parts free cash flowVail Resorts free cash flow
Advance Auto Parts & Vail Resorts appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 22, 2026.