Advance Auto Parts, Inc. (AAP) vs Liquidity Services, Inc. (LQDT)
LQDT leads on 10 of 13 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Advance Auto Parts, Inc. and Liquidity Services, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 14, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
AAP
Advance Auto Parts, Inc.
$60.80Consumer Cyclical
LQDT
Liquidity Services, Inc.
$37.94Consumer Cyclical
Not enough overlapping price history to compare AAP and LQDT.
AAP vs LQDT: by the numbers
- •AAP is the larger company ($3.67B vs $1.18B market cap).
- •LQDT trades at the lower earnings multiple (40.80 vs 84.21 P/E).
- •LQDT converts more revenue to profit (6.30% vs 0.51% net margin).
- •LQDT grew revenue faster over the past five years (16.76% vs -4.27% CAGR).
- •AAP pays a dividend (1.64% yield) while LQDT does not currently pay one.
Which is better, AAP or LQDT?
Metric tally: AAP 3 · LQDT 10It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueLQDT(lower P/E)
GrowthLQDT(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityLQDT(higher ROIC)
Valuation
| Metric | AAP | LQDT |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 84.21 | 40.80● |
| Forward P/E | — | 25.21 |
| P/S ratio | 0.43● | 2.55 |
| P/B ratio | 1.67● | 5.52 |
| PEG ratio | — | 0.80 |
| EV / EBITDA | 11.74● | 18.90 |
| FCF yield | — | 6.35% |
Profitability
| Metric | AAP | LQDT |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 44.04% | 45.61%● |
| Operating margin | 3.16% | 8.37%● |
| Net margin | 0.51% | 6.30%● |
| ROE | 1.99% | 13.62%● |
| ROIC | -1.57% | 11.42%● |
Dividends
| Metric | AAP | LQDT |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 1.64% | — |
| Payout ratio | 136.99% | — |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | AAP | LQDT |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | -4.27% | 16.76%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -36.67% | -0.58%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -16.51% | 6.73%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -19.21% | 10.63%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, AAP or LQDT?
- It depends on your goal. value: LQDT (lower P/E); growth: LQDT (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: LQDT (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, LQDT leads 10 to 3.
- Is AAP or LQDT cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, LQDT is cheaper: AAP trades at a 84.21 P/E and LQDT at 40.80.
- Which has grown faster, AAP or LQDT?
- Over the past five years, LQDT grew revenue faster — AAP at a -4.27% CAGR versus LQDT at 16.76%.
- Does AAP or LQDT pay a bigger dividend?
- AAP pays a dividend (1.64% yield) while LQDT does not currently pay one.
- Is AAP or LQDT more profitable?
- LQDT runs the higher net margin — AAP at 0.51% versus LQDT at 6.30%.
- Which has been the better investment, AAP or LQDT?
- Over the past 10-year, LQDT delivered the higher annualized total return — AAP at -7.59% versus LQDT at 18.06%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Advance Auto Parts P/E ratioLiquidity Services P/E ratioAdvance Auto Parts dividend yieldLiquidity Services dividend yieldAdvance Auto Parts ROELiquidity Services ROEAdvance Auto Parts operating marginLiquidity Services operating marginAdvance Auto Parts revenue growthLiquidity Services revenue growthAdvance Auto Parts free cash flowLiquidity Services free cash flow
Advance Auto Parts & Liquidity Services appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 14, 2026.