Which has the lower trailing P/E, AAP or LQDT?

AAP has the lower trailing P/E: AAP trades at 32.57 and LQDT at 41.66. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, AAP or LQDT?

Over the past five years, LQDT grew revenue faster — AAP at a -4.55% CAGR versus LQDT at 15.03%.

Does AAP or LQDT pay a bigger dividend?

AAP pays a dividend (2.31% yield), while LQDT has no payments in the available dividend history.

Is AAP or LQDT more profitable?

LQDT runs the higher net margin — AAP at 0.97% versus LQDT at 6.79%.

How have AAP and LQDT total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, AAP delivered -10.62% and LQDT delivered 15.64% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Advance Auto Parts, Inc. (AAP) vs Liquidity Services, Inc. (LQDT)

A side-by-side comparison of Advance Auto Parts, Inc. and Liquidity Services, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 10, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

AAP

Advance Auto Parts, Inc.

$2.69B

$44.68Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

LQDT

Liquidity Services, Inc.

$1.32B

$42.49Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — AAP vs LQDT

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

AAP -68.9% (-11.0%/yr)LQDT +328.1% (+15.7%/yr)LQDT compounded faster over this window

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

AAP LQDT

AAP vs LQDT: by the numbers

•AAP is the larger company ($2.69B vs $1.32B market cap).
•AAP trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (32.57 vs 41.66 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•LQDT converts more revenue to profit (6.79% vs 0.97% net margin).
•LQDT grew revenue faster over the past five years (15.03% vs -4.55% CAGR).
•AAP pays a dividend (2.31% yield), while LQDT has no payments in the available dividend history.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	AAP	LQDT
P/E ratio	32.57	41.66
Forward P/E	14.91	25.75
P/S ratio	0.31	2.71
P/B ratio	1.19	5.62
EV / EBITDA	8.26	20.47
FCF yield	0.85%	6.79%

Profitability

Metric	AAP	LQDT
Gross margin	44.66%	46.56%
Operating margin	3.75%	9.00%
Net margin	0.97%	6.79%
ROE	3.72%	14.10%
ROIC	3.49%	11.85%

Dividends

Metric	AAP	LQDT
Dividend yield	2.31%	N/A
Payout ratio	72.89%	N/A

Growth (annualized)

Metric	AAP	LQDT
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	-4.55%	15.03%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	-36.67%	N/A
FCF CAGR (5Y)	-53.33%	9.39%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-24.65%	11.35%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, AAP or LQDT?: AAP has the lower trailing P/E: AAP trades at 32.57 and LQDT at 41.66. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, AAP or LQDT?: Over the past five years, LQDT grew revenue faster — AAP at a -4.55% CAGR versus LQDT at 15.03%.
Does AAP or LQDT pay a bigger dividend?: AAP pays a dividend (2.31% yield), while LQDT has no payments in the available dividend history.
Is AAP or LQDT more profitable?: LQDT runs the higher net margin — AAP at 0.97% versus LQDT at 6.79%.
How have AAP and LQDT total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, AAP delivered -10.62% and LQDT delivered 15.64% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full AAP analysis Full LQDT analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Advance Auto Parts P/E ratio Liquidity Services P/E ratio Advance Auto Parts dividend yield Advance Auto Parts ROE Liquidity Services ROE Advance Auto Parts operating margin Liquidity Services operating margin Advance Auto Parts revenue growth Liquidity Services revenue growth Advance Auto Parts free cash flow Liquidity Services free cash flow

Advance Auto Parts & Liquidity Services appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 10, 2026.