Advance Auto Parts, Inc. (AAP) vs Abercrombie & Fitch Co. (ANF)
A side-by-side comparison of Advance Auto Parts, Inc. and Abercrombie & Fitch Co. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 28, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
AAP
Advance Auto Parts, Inc.
$58.70Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
ANF
Abercrombie & Fitch Co.
$103.16Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — AAP vs ANF
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 25yAAP +358.4%ANF +543.0%ANF compounded faster
AAP ANF
AAP vs ANF: by the numbers
- •ANF is the larger company ($4.58B vs $3.54B market cap).
- •ANF trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (9.53 vs 79.96 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •ANF converts more revenue to profit (9.34% vs 0.51% net margin).
- •ANF grew revenue faster over the past five years (9.07% vs -4.27% CAGR).
- •AAP pays a dividend (1.73% yield), while ANF is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | AAP | ANF |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 79.96 | 9.53 |
| Forward P/E | 31.78 | 10.10 |
| P/S ratio | 0.41 | 0.86 |
| P/B ratio | 1.59 | 3.39 |
| PEG ratio | N/A | 0.16 |
| EV / EBITDA | 10.92 | 6.22 |
| FCF yield | N/A | 9.17% |
Profitability
| Metric | AAP | ANF |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 44.04% | 60.86% |
| Operating margin | 3.16% | 12.94% |
| Net margin | 0.51% | 9.34% |
| ROE | 1.99% | 36.84% |
| ROIC | -1.57% | 18.66% |
Dividends
| Metric | AAP | ANF |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 1.73% | N/A |
| Payout ratio | 136.99% | N/A |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | AAP | ANF |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | -4.27% | 9.07% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -36.67% | 61.20% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -16.51% | 7.11% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -20.77% | 20.77% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, AAP or ANF?
- ANF has the lower trailing P/E: AAP trades at 79.96 and ANF at 9.53. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, AAP or ANF?
- Over the past five years, ANF grew revenue faster — AAP at a -4.27% CAGR versus ANF at 9.07%.
- Does AAP or ANF pay a bigger dividend?
- AAP pays a dividend (1.73% yield), while ANF is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.
- Is AAP or ANF more profitable?
- ANF runs the higher net margin — AAP at 0.51% versus ANF at 9.34%.
- How have AAP and ANF total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, AAP delivered -8.85% and ANF delivered 19.15% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Advance Auto Parts P/E ratioAbercrombie & Fitch P/E ratioAdvance Auto Parts dividend yieldAbercrombie & Fitch dividend yieldAdvance Auto Parts ROEAbercrombie & Fitch ROEAdvance Auto Parts operating marginAbercrombie & Fitch operating marginAdvance Auto Parts revenue growthAbercrombie & Fitch revenue growthAdvance Auto Parts free cash flowAbercrombie & Fitch free cash flow
Advance Auto Parts & Abercrombie & Fitch appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 28, 2026.