Advance Auto Parts, Inc. (AAP) vs Abercrombie & Fitch Co. (ANF)
ANF leads on 11 of 13 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Advance Auto Parts, Inc. and Abercrombie & Fitch Co. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 13, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
AAP
Advance Auto Parts, Inc.
$60.80Consumer Cyclical
ANF
Abercrombie & Fitch Co.
$90.57Consumer Cyclical
Total return — AAP vs ANF
growth of $100 · last 25yAAP +337.4%ANF +287.2%AAP compounded faster
AAP ANF
AAP vs ANF: by the numbers
- •ANF is the larger company ($4.02B vs $3.67B market cap).
- •ANF trades at the lower earnings multiple (8.69 vs 84.21 P/E).
- •ANF converts more revenue to profit (9.34% vs 0.51% net margin).
- •ANF grew revenue faster over the past five years (9.07% vs -4.27% CAGR).
- •AAP pays a dividend (1.64% yield) while ANF does not currently pay one.
Which is better, AAP or ANF?
Metric tally: AAP 2 · ANF 11It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueANF(lower P/E)
GrowthANF(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityANF(higher ROIC)
Valuation
| Metric | AAP | ANF |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 84.21 | 8.69● |
| Forward P/E | — | 9.20 |
| P/S ratio | 0.43● | 0.78 |
| P/B ratio | 1.67● | 3.09 |
| PEG ratio | — | 0.14 |
| EV / EBITDA | 11.74 | 5.57● |
| FCF yield | — | 10.06% |
Profitability
| Metric | AAP | ANF |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 44.04% | 60.86%● |
| Operating margin | 3.16% | 12.94%● |
| Net margin | 0.51% | 9.34%● |
| ROE | 1.99% | 36.84%● |
| ROIC | -1.57% | 18.66%● |
Dividends
| Metric | AAP | ANF |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 1.64% | — |
| Payout ratio | 136.99% | — |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | AAP | ANF |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | -4.27% | 9.07%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -36.67% | 61.20%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -16.51% | 7.11%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -19.21% | 16.00%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, AAP or ANF?
- It depends on your goal. value: ANF (lower P/E); growth: ANF (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: ANF (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, ANF leads 11 to 2.
- Is AAP or ANF cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, ANF is cheaper: AAP trades at a 84.21 P/E and ANF at 8.69.
- Which has grown faster, AAP or ANF?
- Over the past five years, ANF grew revenue faster — AAP at a -4.27% CAGR versus ANF at 9.07%.
- Does AAP or ANF pay a bigger dividend?
- AAP pays a dividend (1.64% yield) while ANF does not currently pay one.
- Is AAP or ANF more profitable?
- ANF runs the higher net margin — AAP at 0.51% versus ANF at 9.34%.
- Which has been the better investment, AAP or ANF?
- Over the past 10-year, ANF delivered the higher annualized total return — AAP at -7.59% versus ANF at 19.21%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Advance Auto Parts P/E ratioAbercrombie & Fitch P/E ratioAdvance Auto Parts dividend yieldAbercrombie & Fitch dividend yieldAdvance Auto Parts ROEAbercrombie & Fitch ROEAdvance Auto Parts operating marginAbercrombie & Fitch operating marginAdvance Auto Parts revenue growthAbercrombie & Fitch revenue growthAdvance Auto Parts free cash flowAbercrombie & Fitch free cash flow
Advance Auto Parts & Abercrombie & Fitch appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 13, 2026.