Which has grown faster, AA or MP?

Over the past five years, MP grew revenue faster — AA at a 5.08% CAGR versus MP at 14.90%.

Does AA or MP pay a bigger dividend?

AA pays a dividend (0.58% yield) while MP does not currently pay one.

Is AA or MP more profitable?

AA runs the higher net margin — AA at 8.17% versus MP at -20.48%.

Which has been the better investment, AA or MP?

Over the past 5-year, AA delivered the higher annualized total return — AA at 13.03% versus MP at 12.44%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Alcoa Corporation (AA) vs MP Materials Corp. (MP)

AA leads on 9 of 11 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Alcoa Corporation and MP Materials Corp. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 13, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Alcoa Corporation

$18.15B

$68.77Basic Materials

MP Materials Corp.

$10.25B

$57.55Basic Materials

Total return — AA vs MP

growth of $100 · last 6y

AA +481.3%MP +475.5%AA compounded faster

AA MP

AA vs MP: by the numbers

•AA is the larger company ($18.15B vs $10.25B market cap).
•AA is profitable (8.17% net margin) while MP runs a net loss (-20.48%).
•MP grew revenue faster over the past five years (14.90% vs 5.08% CAGR).
•AA pays a dividend (0.58% yield) while MP does not currently pay one.

Which is better, AA or MP?

Metric tally: AA 9 · MP 2

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

GrowthMP(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityAA(higher ROIC)

Valuation

Metric	AA	MP
P/E ratio	17.24	—
Forward P/E	8.77●	52.55
P/S ratio	1.44●	32.99
P/B ratio	2.68●	4.82
PEG ratio	0.01	—
EV / EBITDA	11.56●	619.59
FCF yield	1.57%	—

Profitability

Metric	AA	MP
Gross margin	15.20%	24.16%●
Operating margin	3.82%●	-39.42%
Net margin	8.17%●	-20.48%
ROE	15.15%●	-2.99%
ROIC	6.12%●	-2.36%

Dividends

Metric	AA	MP
Dividend yield	0.58%	—
Payout ratio	8.95%	—

Growth (annualized)

Metric	AA	MP
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	5.08%	14.90%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	20.38%	—
FCF CAGR (5Y)	13.41%	—
Total return CAGR (5Y)	14.06%●	12.44%

Frequently asked

Which is better, AA or MP?: It depends on your goal. growth: MP (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: AA (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, AA leads 9 to 2.
Which has grown faster, AA or MP?: Over the past five years, MP grew revenue faster — AA at a 5.08% CAGR versus MP at 14.90%.
Does AA or MP pay a bigger dividend?: AA pays a dividend (0.58% yield) while MP does not currently pay one.
Is AA or MP more profitable?: AA runs the higher net margin — AA at 8.17% versus MP at -20.48%.
Which has been the better investment, AA or MP?: Over the past 5-year, AA delivered the higher annualized total return — AA at 13.03% versus MP at 12.44%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full AA analysis Full MP analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Alcoa P/E ratio MP Materials P/E ratio Alcoa dividend yield MP Materials dividend yield Alcoa ROE MP Materials ROE Alcoa operating margin MP Materials operating margin Alcoa revenue growth MP Materials revenue growth Alcoa free cash flow MP Materials free cash flow

Alcoa & MP Materials appear in these rankings

Best 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 13, 2026.