Agilent Technologies, Inc. (A) vs Waters Corporation (WAT)

A side-by-side comparison of Agilent Technologies, Inc. and Waters Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 13, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Compare

Total returnA vs WAT

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y
A +269.9% (+14.0%/yr)WAT +154.2% (+9.8%/yr)A compounded faster over this window
100200300400Start $10020182020202220242026$370$254
A WAT

A vs WAT: by the numbers

  • A is the larger company ($45.75B vs $41.62B market cap).
  • A trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (31.89 vs 105.72 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
  • A converts more revenue to profit (19.53% vs 3.58% net margin).
  • WAT grew revenue faster over the past five years (11.70% vs 3.72% CAGR).
  • A pays a dividend (0.69% yield), while WAT is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

MetricAWAT
P/E ratio31.89105.72
Forward P/E26.1229.09
P/S ratio6.218.96
P/B ratio6.212.74
EV / EBITDA25.1049.94
FCF yield2.73%0.96%

Profitability

MetricAWAT
Gross margin53.73%50.78%
Operating margin22.23%28.22%
Net margin19.53%3.58%
ROE19.56%1.09%
ROIC11.88%1.34%

Dividends

MetricAWAT
Dividend yield0.69%N/A
Payout ratio19.94%N/A

Growth (annualized)

MetricAWAT
Revenue CAGR (5Y)3.72%11.70%
EPS CAGR (5Y)14.52%5.16%
FCF CAGR (5Y)2.54%-9.10%
Total return CAGR (5Y)-3.00%-0.83%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, A or WAT?
A has the lower trailing P/E: A trades at 31.89 and WAT at 105.72. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, A or WAT?
Over the past five years, WAT grew revenue faster — A at a 3.72% CAGR versus WAT at 11.70%.
Does A or WAT pay a bigger dividend?
A pays a dividend (0.69% yield), while WAT is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.
Is A or WAT more profitable?
A runs the higher net margin — A at 19.53% versus WAT at 3.58%.
How have A and WAT total returns compared?
Over the past 10 years, A delivered 13.47% and WAT delivered 10.36% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 13, 2026.