Agilent Technologies, Inc. (A) vs Edwards Lifesciences Corporation (EW)
A leads on 10 of 16 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Agilent Technologies, Inc. and Edwards Lifesciences Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 27, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
A
Agilent Technologies, Inc.
$136.01Healthcare
EW
Edwards Lifesciences Corporation
$90.78Healthcare
Total return — A vs EW
growth of $100 · last 26yA +76.7%EW +6502.2%EW compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
A EW
A vs EW: by the numbers
- •EW is the larger company ($52.27B vs $38.41B market cap).
- •A trades at the lower earnings multiple (27.31 vs 48.29 P/E).
- •A converts more revenue to profit (19.55% vs 17.34% net margin).
- •EW grew revenue faster over the past five years (7.10% vs 4.45% CAGR).
- •A pays a dividend (0.75% yield) while EW does not currently pay one.
Which is better, A or EW?
Metric tally: A 10 · EW 6It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueA(lower P/E)
GrowthEW(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityA(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | A | EW |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 27.31● | 48.29 |
| Forward P/E | 20.62● | 26.89 |
| P/S ratio | 5.34● | 8.36 |
| P/B ratio | 5.42 | 5.10● |
| PEG ratio | 9.44 | 7.03● |
| EV / EBITDA | 21.93● | 26.80 |
| FCF yield | 3.25%● | 2.07% |
Profitability
| Metric | A | EW |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 53.00% | 78.01%● |
| Operating margin | 21.50% | 27.62%● |
| Net margin | 19.55%● | 17.34% |
| ROE | 19.85%● | 10.58% |
| ROIC | 12.57%● | 11.40% |
Dividends
| Metric | A | EW |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.75% | — |
| Payout ratio | 22.22% | — |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | A | EW |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 4.45% | 7.10%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 14.52%● | 6.87% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 0.05% | 8.74%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -0.89%● | -2.60% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, A or EW?
- It depends on your goal. value: A (lower P/E); growth: EW (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: A (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, A leads 10 to 6.
- Is A or EW cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, A is cheaper: A trades at a 27.31 P/E and EW at 48.29.
- Which has grown faster, A or EW?
- Over the past five years, EW grew revenue faster — A at a 4.45% CAGR versus EW at 7.10%.
- Does A or EW pay a bigger dividend?
- A pays a dividend (0.75% yield) while EW does not currently pay one.
- Is A or EW more profitable?
- A runs the higher net margin — A at 19.55% versus EW at 17.34%.
- Which has been the better investment, A or EW?
- Over the past 10-year, A delivered the higher annualized total return — A at 12.80% versus EW at 10.98%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Agilent Technologies P/E ratioEdwards Lifesciences P/E ratioAgilent Technologies dividend yieldEdwards Lifesciences dividend yieldAgilent Technologies ROEEdwards Lifesciences ROEAgilent Technologies operating marginEdwards Lifesciences operating marginAgilent Technologies revenue growthEdwards Lifesciences revenue growthAgilent Technologies free cash flowEdwards Lifesciences free cash flow
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 27, 2026.