Which has grown faster, WULF or ZBRA?

Over the past five years, WULF grew revenue faster — WULF at a 66.83% CAGR versus ZBRA at 3.31%.

Is WULF or ZBRA more profitable?

ZBRA runs the higher net margin — WULF at -611.46% versus ZBRA at 7.49%.

Which has been the better investment, WULF or ZBRA?

Over the past 10-year, ZBRA delivered the higher annualized total return — WULF at 10.85% versus ZBRA at 16.51%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

TeraWulf Inc. (WULF) vs Zebra Technologies Corporation (ZBRA)

ZBRA leads on 7 of 11 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of TeraWulf Inc. and Zebra Technologies Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 26, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Zebra Technologies Corporation

$11.98B

$251.53Technology

Total return — WULF vs ZBRA

growth of $100 · last 30y

WULF +802.3%ZBRA +3044.1%ZBRA compounded faster

WULF ZBRA

WULF vs ZBRA: by the numbers

•WULF is the larger company ($12.64B vs $11.98B market cap).
•ZBRA is profitable (7.49% net margin) while WULF runs a net loss (-611.46%).
•WULF grew revenue faster over the past five years (66.83% vs 3.31% CAGR).

Which is better, WULF or ZBRA?

Metric tally: WULF 4 · ZBRA 7

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

GrowthWULF(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityZBRA(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	WULF	ZBRA
P/E ratio	—	30.60
Forward P/E	—	13.56
P/S ratio	65.59	2.28●
P/B ratio	73.78	3.67●
EV / EBITDA	—	15.43
FCF yield	—	6.56%

Profitability

Metric	WULF	ZBRA
Gross margin	50.93%●	47.47%
Operating margin	-101.10%	14.38%●
Net margin	-611.46%	7.49%●
ROE	-470.94%	12.05%●
ROIC	-3.18%	8.81%●

Growth (annualized)

Metric	WULF	ZBRA
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	66.83%●	3.31%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	-27.04%	-2.66%●
FCF CAGR (5Y)	26.65%●	-3.79%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	11.38%●	-13.20%

Frequently asked

Which is better, WULF or ZBRA?: It depends on your goal. growth: WULF (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: ZBRA (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, ZBRA leads 7 to 4.
Which has grown faster, WULF or ZBRA?: Over the past five years, WULF grew revenue faster — WULF at a 66.83% CAGR versus ZBRA at 3.31%.
Is WULF or ZBRA more profitable?: ZBRA runs the higher net margin — WULF at -611.46% versus ZBRA at 7.49%.
Which has been the better investment, WULF or ZBRA?: Over the past 10-year, ZBRA delivered the higher annualized total return — WULF at 10.85% versus ZBRA at 16.51%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full WULF analysis Full ZBRA analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

TeraWulf P/E ratio Zebra Technologies P/E ratio TeraWulf dividend yield Zebra Technologies dividend yield TeraWulf ROE Zebra Technologies ROE TeraWulf operating margin Zebra Technologies operating margin TeraWulf revenue growth Zebra Technologies revenue growth TeraWulf free cash flow Zebra Technologies free cash flow

TeraWulf & Zebra Technologies appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Best 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 26, 2026.