Is WCC or XYL cheaper?

On trailing earnings, WCC is cheaper: WCC trades at a 24.65 P/E and XYL at 27.38.

Which has grown faster, WCC or XYL?

Over the past five years, XYL grew revenue faster — WCC at a 10.99% CAGR versus XYL at 12.66%.

Does WCC or XYL pay a bigger dividend?

WCC yields 0.55% and XYL yields 1.51% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is WCC or XYL more profitable?

XYL runs the higher net margin — WCC at 2.79% versus XYL at 10.70%.

Which has been the better investment, WCC or XYL?

Over the past 10-year, WCC delivered the higher annualized total return — WCC at 19.98% versus XYL at 10.47%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

WESCO International, Inc. (WCC) vs Xylem Inc. (XYL)

XYL leads on 9 of 17 compared metrics, though WCC is the cheaper stock.

A side-by-side comparison of WESCO International, Inc. and Xylem Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 15, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

WCC

WESCO International, Inc.

Total return — WCC vs XYL

growth of $100 · last 15y

WCC +775.0%XYL +353.9%WCC compounded faster

WCC XYL

WCC vs XYL: by the numbers

•XYL is the larger company ($26.17B vs $16.89B market cap).
•WCC trades at the lower earnings multiple (24.65 vs 27.38 P/E).
•XYL converts more revenue to profit (10.70% vs 2.79% net margin).
•XYL grew revenue faster over the past five years (12.66% vs 10.99% CAGR).
•XYL pays the higher dividend yield (1.51% vs 0.55%).

Which is better, WCC or XYL?

Metric tally: WCC 8 · XYL 9

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueWCC(lower P/E)

GrowthXYL(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

IncomeXYL(higher dividend yield)

QualityWCC(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	WCC	XYL
P/E ratio	24.65●	27.38
Forward P/E	21.57	19.89●
P/S ratio	0.71●	2.95
P/B ratio	3.37	2.44●
PEG ratio	0.46●	4.89
EV / EBITDA	15.11●	15.56
FCF yield	1.26%	3.61%●

Profitability

Metric	WCC	XYL
Gross margin	20.26%	38.61%●
Operating margin	5.39%	13.60%●
Net margin	2.79%	10.70%●
ROE	13.25%●	8.87%
ROIC	7.45%●	6.42%

Dividends

Metric	WCC	XYL
Dividend yield	0.55%	1.51%●
Payout ratio	14.39%	42.24%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	WCC	XYL
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	10.99%	12.66%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	54.03%●	22.76%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	-18.01%	8.96%●
Total return CAGR (5Y)	26.37%●	-0.21%

Frequently asked

Which is better, WCC or XYL?: It depends on your goal. value: WCC (lower P/E); growth: XYL (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: XYL (higher dividend yield); quality: WCC (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, XYL leads 9 to 8.
Is WCC or XYL cheaper?: On trailing earnings, WCC is cheaper: WCC trades at a 24.65 P/E and XYL at 27.38.
Which has grown faster, WCC or XYL?: Over the past five years, XYL grew revenue faster — WCC at a 10.99% CAGR versus XYL at 12.66%.
Does WCC or XYL pay a bigger dividend?: WCC yields 0.55% and XYL yields 1.51% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is WCC or XYL more profitable?: XYL runs the higher net margin — WCC at 2.79% versus XYL at 10.70%.
Which has been the better investment, WCC or XYL?: Over the past 10-year, WCC delivered the higher annualized total return — WCC at 19.98% versus XYL at 10.47%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full WCC analysis Full XYL analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

WESCO International P/E ratio Xylem P/E ratio WESCO International dividend yield Xylem dividend yield WESCO International ROE Xylem ROE WESCO International operating margin Xylem operating margin WESCO International revenue growth Xylem revenue growth WESCO International free cash flow Xylem free cash flow

WESCO International & Xylem appear in these rankings

Best 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 15, 2026.