Which has grown faster, UHS or WBA?

Over the past five years, UHS grew revenue faster — UHS at a 8.63% CAGR versus WBA at 3.53%.

Does UHS or WBA pay a bigger dividend?

UHS pays a dividend (0.55% yield) while WBA does not currently pay one.

Is UHS or WBA more profitable?

UHS runs the higher net margin — UHS at 8.56% versus WBA at -4.07%.

Which has been the better investment, UHS or WBA?

Over the past 10-year, UHS delivered the higher annualized total return — UHS at 1.10% versus WBA at -14.92%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Universal Health Services, Inc. (UHS) vs Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc. (WBA)

UHS leads on 12 of 13 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Universal Health Services, Inc. and Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 27, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

UHS

Universal Health Services, Inc.

$9.12B

$145.69Healthcare

WBA

Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc.

$10.37B

$11.98Healthcare

Total return — UHS vs WBA

growth of $100 · last 29y

UHS +2706.3%WBA +42.4%UHS compounded faster

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

UHS WBA

UHS vs WBA: by the numbers

•WBA is the larger company ($10.37B vs $9.12B market cap).
•UHS is profitable (8.56% net margin) while WBA runs a net loss (-4.07%).
•UHS grew revenue faster over the past five years (8.63% vs 3.53% CAGR).
•UHS pays a dividend (0.55% yield) while WBA does not currently pay one.

Which is better, UHS or WBA?

Metric tally: UHS 12 · WBA 1

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

GrowthUHS(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityUHS(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	UHS	WBA
P/E ratio	6.11	—
Forward P/E	6.21●	7.65
P/S ratio	0.51	0.07●
P/B ratio	1.19●	1.44
PEG ratio	0.26	—
EV / EBITDA	5.25	—
FCF yield	9.94%●	5.60%

Profitability

Metric	UHS	WBA
Gross margin	90.45%●	17.13%
Operating margin	11.50%●	-2.02%
Net margin	8.56%●	-4.07%
ROE	20.19%●	-87.68%
ROIC	11.29%●	-24.28%

Dividends

Metric	UHS	WBA
Dividend yield	0.55%	—
Payout ratio	3.42%	—

Growth (annualized)

Metric	UHS	WBA
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	8.63%●	3.53%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	16.19%●	5.73%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	-4.64%●	-33.20%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-0.22%●	-16.99%

Frequently asked

Which is better, UHS or WBA?: It depends on your goal. growth: UHS (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: UHS (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, UHS leads 12 to 1.
Which has grown faster, UHS or WBA?: Over the past five years, UHS grew revenue faster — UHS at a 8.63% CAGR versus WBA at 3.53%.
Does UHS or WBA pay a bigger dividend?: UHS pays a dividend (0.55% yield) while WBA does not currently pay one.
Is UHS or WBA more profitable?: UHS runs the higher net margin — UHS at 8.56% versus WBA at -4.07%.
Which has been the better investment, UHS or WBA?: Over the past 10-year, UHS delivered the higher annualized total return — UHS at 1.10% versus WBA at -14.92%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full UHS analysis Full WBA analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Universal Health Services P/E ratio Walgreens Boots Alliance P/E ratio Universal Health Services dividend yield Walgreens Boots Alliance dividend yield Universal Health Services ROE Walgreens Boots Alliance ROE Universal Health Services operating margin Walgreens Boots Alliance operating margin Universal Health Services revenue growth Walgreens Boots Alliance revenue growth Universal Health Services free cash flow Walgreens Boots Alliance free cash flow

Universal Health Services & Walgreens Boots Alliance appear in these rankings

Highest FCF Yield Stocks Lowest P/E Ratio Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 27, 2026.