Which has grown faster, TTD or WULF?

Over the past five years, WULF grew revenue faster — TTD at a 27.10% CAGR versus WULF at 66.83%.

Is TTD or WULF more profitable?

TTD runs the higher net margin — TTD at 14.57% versus WULF at -611.46%.

Which has been the better investment, TTD or WULF?

Over the past 5-year, WULF delivered the higher annualized total return — TTD at -26.59% versus WULF at 5.71%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

The Trade Desk, Inc. (TTD) vs TeraWulf Inc. (WULF)

TTD leads on 9 of 11 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of The Trade Desk, Inc. and TeraWulf Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 25, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

TTD

The Trade Desk, Inc.

$8.13B

$17.29TechnologyAt close: Jul 24, 2026, 4:00 PM ET

WULF

TeraWulf Inc.

$9.15B

$18.46TechnologyAt close: Jul 24, 2026, 4:00 PM ET

Total return — TTD vs WULF

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

TTD +474.4%WULF +114.0%TTD compounded faster

TTD WULF

TTD vs WULF: by the numbers

•WULF is the larger company ($9.15B vs $8.13B market cap).
•TTD is profitable (14.57% net margin) while WULF runs a net loss (-611.46%).
•WULF grew revenue faster over the past five years (66.83% vs 27.10% CAGR).

Which is better, TTD or WULF?

Metric tally: TTD 9 · WULF 2

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

GrowthWULF(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityTTD(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	TTD	WULF
P/E ratio	19.43	—
Forward P/E	17.34	—
P/S ratio	2.78●	46.46
P/B ratio	3.36●	52.26
PEG ratio	2.75	—
EV / EBITDA	10.75	—
FCF yield	10.15%	—

Profitability

Metric	TTD	WULF
Gross margin	77.83%●	50.93%
Operating margin	20.26%●	-101.10%
Net margin	14.57%●	-611.46%
ROE	17.63%●	-470.94%
ROIC	13.38%●	-3.18%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	TTD	WULF
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	27.10%	66.83%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	12.09%●	-27.04%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	18.88%●	-2.15%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-26.59%	1.85%●

Frequently asked

Which is better, TTD or WULF?: It depends on your goal. growth: WULF (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: TTD (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, TTD leads 9 to 2.
Which has grown faster, TTD or WULF?: Over the past five years, WULF grew revenue faster — TTD at a 27.10% CAGR versus WULF at 66.83%.
Is TTD or WULF more profitable?: TTD runs the higher net margin — TTD at 14.57% versus WULF at -611.46%.
Which has been the better investment, TTD or WULF?: Over the past 5-year, WULF delivered the higher annualized total return — TTD at -26.59% versus WULF at 5.71%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full TTD analysis Full WULF analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Trade Desk P/E ratio TeraWulf P/E ratio Trade Desk dividend yield TeraWulf dividend yield Trade Desk ROE TeraWulf ROE Trade Desk operating margin TeraWulf operating margin Trade Desk revenue growth TeraWulf revenue growth Trade Desk free cash flow TeraWulf free cash flow

Trade Desk & TeraWulf appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 25, 2026.