Terreno Realty Corporation (TRNO) vs Zoom Communications, Inc. (ZM)
TRNO and ZM are evenly matched — 8 metrics each of 16.
A side-by-side comparison of Terreno Realty Corporation and Zoom Communications, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 13, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
TRNO
Terreno Realty Corporation
$67.27Real Estate
ZM
Zoom Communications, Inc.
$93.68Technology
Total return — TRNO vs ZM
growth of $100 · last 7yTRNO +55.8%ZM +51.1%TRNO compounded faster
TRNO ZM
TRNO vs ZM: by the numbers
- •ZM is the larger company ($27.47B vs $7.15B market cap).
- •ZM trades at the lower earnings multiple (13.78 vs 16.49 P/E).
- •TRNO converts more revenue to profit (86.52% vs 41.99% net margin).
- •TRNO grew revenue faster over the past five years (20.57% vs 8.51% CAGR).
- •TRNO pays a dividend (3.05% yield) while ZM does not currently pay one.
Which is better, TRNO or ZM?
Metric tally: TRNO 8 · ZM 8It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueZM(lower P/E)
GrowthTRNO(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityZM(higher ROIC)
Valuation
| Metric | TRNO | ZM |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 16.49 | 13.78● |
| Forward P/E | 40.04 | 14.92● |
| P/S ratio | 14.43 | 5.70● |
| P/B ratio | 1.65● | 2.82 |
| PEG ratio | 0.14● | 0.16 |
| EV / EBITDA | 13.82 | 9.98● |
| FCF yield | 2.87% | 6.97%● |
Profitability
| Metric | TRNO | ZM |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 63.89% | 77.40%● |
| Operating margin | 40.81%● | 24.17% |
| Net margin | 86.52%● | 41.99% |
| ROE | 9.88% | 20.77%● |
| ROIC | 3.66% | 8.82%● |
Dividends
| Metric | TRNO | ZM |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 3.05% | — |
| Payout ratio | 52.16% | — |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | TRNO | ZM |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 20.57%● | 8.51% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 35.52%● | 21.68% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 22.41%● | 4.31% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 3.07%● | -23.86% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, TRNO or ZM?
- It depends on your goal. value: ZM (lower P/E); growth: TRNO (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: ZM (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, they are evenly matched.
- Is TRNO or ZM cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, ZM is cheaper: TRNO trades at a 16.49 P/E and ZM at 13.78.
- Which has grown faster, TRNO or ZM?
- Over the past five years, TRNO grew revenue faster — TRNO at a 20.57% CAGR versus ZM at 8.51%.
- Does TRNO or ZM pay a bigger dividend?
- TRNO pays a dividend (3.05% yield) while ZM does not currently pay one.
- Is TRNO or ZM more profitable?
- TRNO runs the higher net margin — TRNO at 86.52% versus ZM at 41.99%.
- Which has been the better investment, TRNO or ZM?
- Over the past 5-year, TRNO delivered the higher annualized total return — TRNO at 13.47% versus ZM at -23.86%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Terreno Realty P/E ratioZoom Communications P/E ratioTerreno Realty dividend yieldZoom Communications dividend yieldTerreno Realty ROEZoom Communications ROETerreno Realty operating marginZoom Communications operating marginTerreno Realty revenue growthZoom Communications revenue growthTerreno Realty free cash flowZoom Communications free cash flow
Terreno Realty & Zoom Communications appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 13, 2026.