Thomson Reuters Corporation (TRI) vs Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation (WAB)
TRI leads on 11 of 17 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Thomson Reuters Corporation and Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 15, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
TRI
Thomson Reuters Corporation
$98.30IndustrialsDelayed quote: Jul 15, 2026, 10:45 AM EDT
WAB
Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation
$259.18IndustrialsDelayed quote: Jul 15, 2026, 10:45 AM EDT
Total return — TRI vs WAB
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 24yTRI +370.1%WAB +4277.9%WAB compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
TRI WAB
TRI vs WAB: by the numbers
- •WAB is the larger company ($43.98B vs $42.91B market cap).
- •TRI trades at the lower earnings multiple (26.82 vs 37.06 P/E).
- •TRI converts more revenue to profit (19.93% vs 10.52% net margin).
- •WAB grew revenue faster over the past five years (9.07% vs 4.86% CAGR).
- •TRI pays the higher dividend yield (4.30% vs 0.43%).
Which is better, TRI or WAB?
Metric tally: TRI 11 · WAB 6It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueTRI(lower P/E)
GrowthWAB(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeTRI(higher dividend yield)
QualityTRI(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | TRI | WAB |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 26.82● | 37.06 |
| Forward P/E | 21.18● | 24.68 |
| P/S ratio | 5.24 | 3.89● |
| P/B ratio | 3.39● | 4.01 |
| PEG ratio | 3.72 | 2.32● |
| EV / EBITDA | 14.11● | 21.93 |
| FCF yield | 5.21%● | 3.67% |
Profitability
| Metric | TRI | WAB |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 75.81%● | 33.81% |
| Operating margin | 26.66%● | 16.10% |
| Net margin | 19.93%● | 10.52% |
| ROE | 12.89%● | 10.85% |
| ROIC | 10.13%● | 7.64% |
Dividends
| Metric | TRI | WAB |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 4.30%● | 0.43% |
| Payout ratio | 116.05% | 16.33% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | TRI | WAB |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 4.86% | 9.07%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 7.22% | 25.77%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 9.45% | 9.83%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -1.13% | 26.72%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, TRI or WAB?
- It depends on your goal. value: TRI (lower P/E); growth: WAB (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: TRI (higher dividend yield); quality: TRI (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, TRI leads 11 to 6.
- Is TRI or WAB cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, TRI is cheaper: TRI trades at a 26.82 P/E and WAB at 37.06.
- Which has grown faster, TRI or WAB?
- Over the past five years, WAB grew revenue faster — TRI at a 4.86% CAGR versus WAB at 9.07%.
- Does TRI or WAB pay a bigger dividend?
- TRI yields 4.30% and WAB yields 0.43% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is TRI or WAB more profitable?
- TRI runs the higher net margin — TRI at 19.93% versus WAB at 10.52%.
- Which has been the better investment, TRI or WAB?
- Over the past 10-year, WAB delivered the higher annualized total return — TRI at 8.55% versus WAB at 14.54%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Thomson Reuters P/E ratioWestinghouse Air Brake Technologies P/E ratioThomson Reuters dividend yieldWestinghouse Air Brake Technologies dividend yieldThomson Reuters ROEWestinghouse Air Brake Technologies ROEThomson Reuters operating marginWestinghouse Air Brake Technologies operating marginThomson Reuters revenue growthWestinghouse Air Brake Technologies revenue growthThomson Reuters free cash flowWestinghouse Air Brake Technologies free cash flow
Thomson Reuters & Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 15, 2026.