Thomson Reuters Corporation (TRI) vs Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation (WAB)

TRI leads on 11 of 17 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Thomson Reuters Corporation and Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 15, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Compare

Total returnTRI vs WAB

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 24y
TRI +370.1%WAB +4277.9%WAB compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
101001k10kStart $100200620102014201820222026$470$4,378
TRI WAB

TRI vs WAB: by the numbers

  • WAB is the larger company ($43.98B vs $42.91B market cap).
  • TRI trades at the lower earnings multiple (26.82 vs 37.06 P/E).
  • TRI converts more revenue to profit (19.93% vs 10.52% net margin).
  • WAB grew revenue faster over the past five years (9.07% vs 4.86% CAGR).
  • TRI pays the higher dividend yield (4.30% vs 0.43%).

Which is better, TRI or WAB?

Metric tally: TRI 11 · WAB 6

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueTRI(lower P/E)
GrowthWAB(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeTRI(higher dividend yield)
QualityTRI(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

MetricTRIWAB
P/E ratio26.8237.06
Forward P/E21.1824.68
P/S ratio5.243.89
P/B ratio3.394.01
PEG ratio3.722.32
EV / EBITDA14.1121.93
FCF yield5.21%3.67%

Profitability

MetricTRIWAB
Gross margin75.81%33.81%
Operating margin26.66%16.10%
Net margin19.93%10.52%
ROE12.89%10.85%
ROIC10.13%7.64%

Dividends

MetricTRIWAB
Dividend yield4.30%0.43%
Payout ratio116.05%16.33%

Growth (annualized)

MetricTRIWAB
Revenue CAGR (5Y)4.86%9.07%
EPS CAGR (5Y)7.22%25.77%
FCF CAGR (5Y)9.45%9.83%
Total return CAGR (5Y)-1.13%26.72%

Frequently asked

Which is better, TRI or WAB?
It depends on your goal. value: TRI (lower P/E); growth: WAB (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: TRI (higher dividend yield); quality: TRI (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, TRI leads 11 to 6.
Is TRI or WAB cheaper?
On trailing earnings, TRI is cheaper: TRI trades at a 26.82 P/E and WAB at 37.06.
Which has grown faster, TRI or WAB?
Over the past five years, WAB grew revenue faster — TRI at a 4.86% CAGR versus WAB at 9.07%.
Does TRI or WAB pay a bigger dividend?
TRI yields 4.30% and WAB yields 0.43% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is TRI or WAB more profitable?
TRI runs the higher net margin — TRI at 19.93% versus WAB at 10.52%.
Which has been the better investment, TRI or WAB?
Over the past 10-year, WAB delivered the higher annualized total return — TRI at 8.55% versus WAB at 14.54%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 15, 2026.