Thomson Reuters Corporation (TRI) vs Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation (WAB)
A side-by-side comparison of Thomson Reuters Corporation and Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of August 29, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
TRI
Thomson Reuters Corporation
$106.23IndustrialsAt close: Aug 28, 2026, 4:00 PM ET
WAB
Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation
$292.23IndustrialsAt close: Aug 28, 2026, 4:00 PM ET
Total return — TRI vs WAB
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yTRI +166.5% (+10.3%/yr)WAB +310.7% (+15.2%/yr)WAB compounded faster over this window
TRI WAB
TRI vs WAB: by the numbers
- •WAB is the larger company ($49.36B vs $46.37B market cap).
- •TRI trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (28.40 vs 39.28 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •TRI converts more revenue to profit (21.22% vs 10.59% net margin).
- •WAB grew revenue faster over the past five years (9.16% vs 4.88% CAGR).
- •TRI pays the higher dividend yield (3.71% vs 0.30%).
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | TRI | WAB |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 28.40 | 39.28 |
| Forward P/E | 23.73 | 26.90 |
| P/S ratio | 5.95 | 4.15 |
| P/B ratio | 4.19 | 4.42 |
| EV / EBITDA | 15.68 | 22.51 |
| FCF yield | 4.76% | 3.73% |
Profitability
| Metric | TRI | WAB |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 75.80% | 34.33% |
| Operating margin | 27.64% | 16.54% |
| Net margin | 21.22% | 10.59% |
| ROE | 14.96% | 11.29% |
| ROIC | 11.04% | 7.64% |
Dividends
| Metric | TRI | WAB |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 3.71% | 0.30% |
| Payout ratio | 116.05% | 12.68% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | TRI | WAB |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 4.88% | 9.16% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 7.22% | 25.77% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 9.45% | 14.38% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -0.75% | 27.21% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, TRI or WAB?
- TRI has the lower trailing P/E: TRI trades at 28.40 and WAB at 39.28. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, TRI or WAB?
- Over the past five years, WAB grew revenue faster — TRI at a 4.88% CAGR versus WAB at 9.16%.
- Does TRI or WAB pay a bigger dividend?
- TRI yields 3.71% and WAB yields 0.30% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is TRI or WAB more profitable?
- TRI runs the higher net margin — TRI at 21.22% versus WAB at 10.59%.
- How have TRI and WAB total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, TRI delivered 10.56% and WAB delivered 15.17% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Thomson Reuters P/E ratioWestinghouse Air Brake Technologies P/E ratioThomson Reuters dividend yieldWestinghouse Air Brake Technologies dividend yieldThomson Reuters ROEWestinghouse Air Brake Technologies ROEThomson Reuters operating marginWestinghouse Air Brake Technologies operating marginThomson Reuters revenue growthWestinghouse Air Brake Technologies revenue growthThomson Reuters free cash flowWestinghouse Air Brake Technologies free cash flow
Thomson Reuters & Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified August 29, 2026.