Tapestry, Inc. (TPR) vs Ulta Beauty, Inc. (ULTA)
ULTA leads on 10 of 15 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Tapestry, Inc. and Ulta Beauty, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 25, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
TPR
Tapestry, Inc.
$149.75Consumer Cyclical
ULTA
Ulta Beauty, Inc.
$478.93Consumer Cyclical
Total return — TPR vs ULTA
growth of $100 · last 19yTPR +325.7%ULTA +1506.1%ULTA compounded faster
TPR ULTA
TPR vs ULTA: by the numbers
- •TPR is the larger company ($30.26B vs $20.59B market cap).
- •ULTA trades at the lower earnings multiple (17.95 vs 48.00 P/E).
- •ULTA converts more revenue to profit (9.36% vs 8.44% net margin).
- •ULTA grew revenue faster over the past five years (12.93% vs 10.13% CAGR).
- •TPR pays a dividend (1.07% yield) while ULTA does not currently pay one.
Which is better, TPR or ULTA?
Metric tally: TPR 5 · ULTA 10It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueULTA(lower P/E)
GrowthULTA(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityULTA(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | TPR | ULTA |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 48.00 | 17.95● |
| Forward P/E | 21.47 | 15.00● |
| P/S ratio | 3.97 | 1.66● |
| P/B ratio | 45.71 | 8.16● |
| PEG ratio | — | 22.87 |
| EV / EBITDA | 30.57 | 12.26● |
| FCF yield | 5.63%● | 4.98% |
Profitability
| Metric | TPR | ULTA |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 76.18%● | 39.33% |
| Operating margin | 11.32% | 12.54%● |
| Net margin | 8.44% | 9.36%● |
| ROE | 97.13%● | 46.06% |
| ROIC | 6.59% | 22.76%● |
Dividends
| Metric | TPR | ULTA |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 1.07% | — |
| Payout ratio | 188.24% | — |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | TPR | ULTA |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 10.13% | 12.93%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -14.80% | 52.49%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 16.89%● | 0.55% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 31.70%● | 6.36% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, TPR or ULTA?
- It depends on your goal. value: ULTA (lower P/E); growth: ULTA (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: ULTA (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, ULTA leads 10 to 5.
- Is TPR or ULTA cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, ULTA is cheaper: TPR trades at a 48.00 P/E and ULTA at 17.95.
- Which has grown faster, TPR or ULTA?
- Over the past five years, ULTA grew revenue faster — TPR at a 10.13% CAGR versus ULTA at 12.93%.
- Does TPR or ULTA pay a bigger dividend?
- TPR pays a dividend (1.07% yield) while ULTA does not currently pay one.
- Is TPR or ULTA more profitable?
- ULTA runs the higher net margin — TPR at 8.44% versus ULTA at 9.36%.
- Which has been the better investment, TPR or ULTA?
- Over the past 10-year, TPR delivered the higher annualized total return — TPR at 17.73% versus ULTA at 7.19%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Tapestry P/E ratioUlta Beauty P/E ratioTapestry dividend yieldUlta Beauty dividend yieldTapestry ROEUlta Beauty ROETapestry operating marginUlta Beauty operating marginTapestry revenue growthUlta Beauty revenue growthTapestry free cash flowUlta Beauty free cash flow
Tapestry & Ulta Beauty appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 25, 2026.