Molson Coors Beverage Company (TAP) vs Universal Corporation (UVV)
UVV leads on 8 of 14 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Molson Coors Beverage Company and Universal Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 28, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
TAP
Molson Coors Beverage Company
$41.48Consumer Defensive
UVV
Universal Corporation
$53.79Consumer Defensive
Total return — TAP vs UVV
growth of $100 · last 30yTAP +364.0%UVV +103.0%TAP compounded faster
TAP UVV
TAP vs UVV: by the numbers
- •TAP is the larger company ($7.78B vs $1.34B market cap).
- •UVV is profitable (1.12% net margin) while TAP runs a net loss (-18.85%).
- •UVV grew revenue faster over the past five years (8.08% vs 3.44% CAGR).
- •UVV pays the higher dividend yield (6.17% vs 4.63%).
Which is better, TAP or UVV?
Metric tally: TAP 6 · UVV 8It depends on what you're optimizing for:
GrowthUVV(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeUVV(higher dividend yield)
QualityUVV(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | TAP | UVV |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | — | 41.38 |
| Forward P/E | 8.37● | 12.90 |
| P/S ratio | 0.70 | 0.46● |
| P/B ratio | 0.78● | 0.96 |
| EV / EBITDA | — | 8.52 |
| FCF yield | 14.86%● | 5.92% |
Profitability
| Metric | TAP | UVV |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 37.83%● | 17.47% |
| Operating margin | -20.28% | 7.13%● |
| Net margin | -18.85% | 1.12%● |
| ROE | -20.98% | 2.31%● |
| ROIC | -10.20% | 4.61%● |
Dividends
| Metric | TAP | UVV |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 4.63% | 6.17%● |
| Payout ratio | — | 255.38% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | TAP | UVV |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 3.44% | 8.08%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 36.85%● | -18.20% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 1.73%● | -12.25% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -2.58% | 5.46%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, TAP or UVV?
- It depends on your goal. growth: UVV (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: UVV (higher dividend yield); quality: UVV (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, UVV leads 8 to 6.
- Which has grown faster, TAP or UVV?
- Over the past five years, UVV grew revenue faster — TAP at a 3.44% CAGR versus UVV at 8.08%.
- Does TAP or UVV pay a bigger dividend?
- TAP yields 4.63% and UVV yields 6.17% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is TAP or UVV more profitable?
- UVV runs the higher net margin — TAP at -18.85% versus UVV at 1.12%.
- Which has been the better investment, TAP or UVV?
- Over the past 10-year, UVV delivered the higher annualized total return — TAP at -6.02% versus UVV at 5.39%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Molson Coors Beverage P/E ratioUniversal P/E ratioMolson Coors Beverage dividend yieldUniversal dividend yieldMolson Coors Beverage ROEUniversal ROEMolson Coors Beverage operating marginUniversal operating marginMolson Coors Beverage revenue growthUniversal revenue growthMolson Coors Beverage free cash flowUniversal free cash flow
Molson Coors Beverage & Universal appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 28, 2026.