Is SQ or TER cheaper?

On trailing earnings, SQ is cheaper: SQ trades at a 49.81 P/E and TER at 74.67.

Which has grown faster, SQ or TER?

Over the past five years, SQ grew revenue faster — SQ at a 13.19% CAGR versus TER at 3.76%.

Does SQ or TER pay a bigger dividend?

TER pays a dividend (0.12% yield) while SQ does not currently pay one.

Is SQ or TER more profitable?

TER runs the higher net margin — SQ at -2.04% versus TER at 22.55%.

Which has been the better investment, SQ or TER?

Over the past 5-year, TER delivered the higher annualized total return — SQ at 4.50% versus TER at 35.84%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Block, Inc. (SQ) vs Teradyne, Inc. (TER)

SQ leads on 9 of 16 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Block, Inc. and Teradyne, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 13, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Total return — SQ vs TER

growth of $100 · last 9y

SQ +590.0%TER +531.3%SQ compounded faster

SQ TER

SQ vs TER: by the numbers

•TER is the larger company ($63.12B vs $51.73B market cap).
•SQ trades at the lower earnings multiple (49.81 vs 74.67 P/E).
•TER is profitable (22.55% net margin) while SQ runs a net loss (-2.04%).
•SQ grew revenue faster over the past five years (13.19% vs 3.76% CAGR).
•TER pays a dividend (0.12% yield) while SQ does not currently pay one.

Which is better, SQ or TER?

Metric tally: SQ 9 · TER 7

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueSQ(lower P/E)

GrowthSQ(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityTER(higher ROIC)

Valuation

Metric	SQ	TER
P/E ratio	49.81●	74.67
Forward P/E	15.90●	54.71
P/S ratio	2.35●	16.78
P/B ratio	2.82●	20.22
PEG ratio	696.22	23.29●
EV / EBITDA	26.61●	57.36
FCF yield	1.28%●	0.87%

Profitability

Metric	SQ	TER
Gross margin	44.85%	58.79%●
Operating margin	4.93%	26.92%●
Net margin	-2.04%	22.55%●
ROE	-2.30%	27.17%●
ROIC	-12.82%	18.45%●

Dividends

Metric	SQ	TER
Dividend yield	—	0.12%
Payout ratio	—	14.33%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	SQ	TER
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	13.19%●	3.76%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	34.72%●	-5.86%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	64.00%●	-3.97%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	4.50%	26.28%●

Frequently asked

Which is better, SQ or TER?: It depends on your goal. value: SQ (lower P/E); growth: SQ (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: TER (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, SQ leads 9 to 7.
Is SQ or TER cheaper?: On trailing earnings, SQ is cheaper: SQ trades at a 49.81 P/E and TER at 74.67.
Which has grown faster, SQ or TER?: Over the past five years, SQ grew revenue faster — SQ at a 13.19% CAGR versus TER at 3.76%.
Does SQ or TER pay a bigger dividend?: TER pays a dividend (0.12% yield) while SQ does not currently pay one.
Is SQ or TER more profitable?: TER runs the higher net margin — SQ at -2.04% versus TER at 22.55%.
Which has been the better investment, SQ or TER?: Over the past 5-year, TER delivered the higher annualized total return — SQ at 4.50% versus TER at 35.84%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full SQ analysis Full TER analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Block P/E ratio Teradyne P/E ratio Block dividend yield Teradyne dividend yield Block ROE Teradyne ROE Block operating margin Teradyne operating margin Block revenue growth Teradyne revenue growth Block free cash flow Teradyne free cash flow

Block & Teradyne appear in these rankings

Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Best 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 13, 2026.