Silicon Motion Technology Corporation (SIMO) vs Zebra Technologies Corporation (ZBRA)
SIMO leads on 9 of 14 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Silicon Motion Technology Corporation and Zebra Technologies Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 13, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
SIMO
Silicon Motion Technology Corporation
$280.49Technology
ZBRA
Zebra Technologies Corporation
$228.42Technology
Not enough overlapping price history to compare SIMO and ZBRA.
SIMO vs ZBRA: by the numbers
- •ZBRA is the larger company ($10.88B vs $9.41B market cap).
- •SIMO trades at the lower earnings multiple (21.85 vs 27.79 P/E).
- •SIMO converts more revenue to profit (16.02% vs 7.49% net margin).
- •SIMO grew revenue faster over the past five years (12.49% vs 3.31% CAGR).
- •SIMO pays a dividend (0.71% yield) while ZBRA does not currently pay one.
Which is better, SIMO or ZBRA?
Metric tally: SIMO 9 · ZBRA 5It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueSIMO(lower P/E)
GrowthSIMO(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualitySIMO(higher ROIC)
Valuation
| Metric | SIMO | ZBRA |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 21.85● | 27.79 |
| Forward P/E | 32.07 | 12.31● |
| P/S ratio | 2.66 | 2.07● |
| P/B ratio | 2.84● | 3.33 |
| PEG ratio | 0.17 | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 12.65● | 15.44 |
| FCF yield | 0.27% | 7.23%● |
Profitability
| Metric | SIMO | ZBRA |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 48.09% | 47.47% |
| Operating margin | 12.77% | 14.38%● |
| Net margin | 16.02%● | 7.49% |
| ROE | 18.76%● | 12.05% |
| ROIC | 9.22%● | 8.81% |
Dividends
| Metric | SIMO | ZBRA |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.71% | — |
| Payout ratio | 13.70% | — |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | SIMO | ZBRA |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 12.49%● | 3.31% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 44.85%● | -2.66% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -42.00% | -3.79%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 37.00%● | -14.78% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, SIMO or ZBRA?
- It depends on your goal. value: SIMO (lower P/E); growth: SIMO (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: SIMO (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, SIMO leads 9 to 5.
- Is SIMO or ZBRA cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, SIMO is cheaper: SIMO trades at a 21.85 P/E and ZBRA at 27.79.
- Which has grown faster, SIMO or ZBRA?
- Over the past five years, SIMO grew revenue faster — SIMO at a 12.49% CAGR versus ZBRA at 3.31%.
- Does SIMO or ZBRA pay a bigger dividend?
- SIMO pays a dividend (0.71% yield) while ZBRA does not currently pay one.
- Is SIMO or ZBRA more profitable?
- SIMO runs the higher net margin — SIMO at 16.02% versus ZBRA at 7.49%.
- Which has been the better investment, SIMO or ZBRA?
- Over the past 10-year, SIMO delivered the higher annualized total return — SIMO at 23.11% versus ZBRA at 15.08%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Silicon Motion Technology P/E ratioZebra Technologies P/E ratioSilicon Motion Technology dividend yieldZebra Technologies dividend yieldSilicon Motion Technology ROEZebra Technologies ROESilicon Motion Technology operating marginZebra Technologies operating marginSilicon Motion Technology revenue growthZebra Technologies revenue growthSilicon Motion Technology free cash flowZebra Technologies free cash flow
Silicon Motion Technology & Zebra Technologies appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 13, 2026.