Silicon Motion Technology Corporation (SIMO) vs Zillow Group, Inc. Class C (Z)
SIMO leads on 11 of 15 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Silicon Motion Technology Corporation and Zillow Group, Inc. Class C across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 25, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
SIMO
Silicon Motion Technology Corporation
$270.90TechnologyAt close: Jul 24, 2026, 4:00 PM ET
Z
Zillow Group, Inc. Class C
$30.76Communication ServicesAt close: Jul 24, 2026, 4:00 PM ET
Total return — SIMO vs Z
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 11ySIMO +1227.1%Z -59.8%SIMO compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
SIMO Z
SIMO vs Z: by the numbers
- •SIMO is the larger company ($9.09B vs $7.39B market cap).
- •SIMO trades at the lower earnings multiple (21.10 vs 123.43 P/E).
- •SIMO converts more revenue to profit (16.02% vs 2.27% net margin).
- •SIMO grew revenue faster over the past five years (12.49% vs 9.73% CAGR).
- •SIMO pays a dividend (0.74% yield) while Z does not currently pay one.
Which is better, SIMO or Z?
Metric tally: SIMO 11 · Z 4It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueSIMO(lower P/E)
GrowthSIMO(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualitySIMO(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | SIMO | Z |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 21.10● | 123.43 |
| Forward P/E | 30.51 | — |
| P/S ratio | 2.57● | 2.74 |
| P/B ratio | 2.74 | 1.67● |
| PEG ratio | 0.17● | 44.56 |
| EV / EBITDA | 16.83● | 24.73 |
| FCF yield | 0.28% | 5.85%● |
Profitability
| Metric | SIMO | Z |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 48.09% | 73.34%● |
| Operating margin | 12.77%● | 0.41% |
| Net margin | 16.02%● | 2.27% |
| ROE | 18.76%● | 1.38% |
| ROIC | 9.22%● | -0.55% |
Dividends
| Metric | SIMO | Z |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.74% | — |
| Payout ratio | 13.70% | — |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | SIMO | Z |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 12.49%● | 9.73% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 44.85%● | 2.77% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -42.15% | -5.73%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 37.15%● | -22.72% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, SIMO or Z?
- It depends on your goal. value: SIMO (lower P/E); growth: SIMO (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: SIMO (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, SIMO leads 11 to 4.
- Is SIMO or Z cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, SIMO is cheaper: SIMO trades at a 21.10 P/E and Z at 123.43.
- Which has grown faster, SIMO or Z?
- Over the past five years, SIMO grew revenue faster — SIMO at a 12.49% CAGR versus Z at 9.73%.
- Does SIMO or Z pay a bigger dividend?
- SIMO pays a dividend (0.74% yield) while Z does not currently pay one.
- Is SIMO or Z more profitable?
- SIMO runs the higher net margin — SIMO at 16.02% versus Z at 2.27%.
- Which has been the better investment, SIMO or Z?
- Over the past 10-year, SIMO delivered the higher annualized total return — SIMO at 20.85% versus Z at -2.10%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Silicon Motion Technology P/E ratioZillow Group P/E ratioSilicon Motion Technology dividend yieldZillow Group dividend yieldSilicon Motion Technology ROEZillow Group ROESilicon Motion Technology operating marginZillow Group operating marginSilicon Motion Technology revenue growthZillow Group revenue growthSilicon Motion Technology free cash flowZillow Group free cash flow
Silicon Motion Technology & Zillow Group appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 25, 2026.