Which has grown faster, SIMO or U?

Over the past five years, U grew revenue faster — SIMO at a 12.49% CAGR versus U at 18.01%.

Does SIMO or U pay a bigger dividend?

SIMO pays a dividend (0.71% yield) while U does not currently pay one.

Is SIMO or U more profitable?

SIMO runs the higher net margin — SIMO at 16.02% versus U at -34.95%.

Which has been the better investment, SIMO or U?

Over the past 5-year, SIMO delivered the higher annualized total return — SIMO at 23.11% versus U at -22.81%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Silicon Motion Technology Corporation (SIMO) vs Unity Software Inc. (U)

SIMO leads on 9 of 12 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Silicon Motion Technology Corporation and Unity Software Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 13, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

SIMO

Silicon Motion Technology Corporation

Total return — SIMO vs U

growth of $100 · last 6y

SIMO +637.4%U -60.1%SIMO compounded faster

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

SIMO U

SIMO vs U: by the numbers

•U is the larger company ($11.89B vs $9.41B market cap).
•SIMO is profitable (16.02% net margin) while U runs a net loss (-34.95%).
•U grew revenue faster over the past five years (18.01% vs 12.49% CAGR).
•SIMO pays a dividend (0.71% yield) while U does not currently pay one.

Which is better, SIMO or U?

Metric tally: SIMO 9 · U 3

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

GrowthU(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualitySIMO(higher ROIC)

Valuation

Metric	SIMO	U
P/E ratio	21.85	—
Forward P/E	32.07●	51.16
P/S ratio	2.66●	6.15
P/B ratio	2.84●	3.98
PEG ratio	0.17	—
EV / EBITDA	12.65●	210.82
FCF yield	0.27%	3.92%●

Profitability

Metric	SIMO	U
Gross margin	48.09%	59.38%●
Operating margin	12.77%●	-36.09%
Net margin	16.02%●	-34.95%
ROE	18.76%●	-22.58%
ROIC	9.22%●	-7.17%

Dividends

Metric	SIMO	U
Dividend yield	0.71%	—
Payout ratio	13.70%	—

Growth (annualized)

Metric	SIMO	U
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	12.49%	18.01%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	44.85%	—
FCF CAGR (5Y)	-42.00%	—
Total return CAGR (5Y)	37.00%●	-22.81%

Frequently asked

Which is better, SIMO or U?: It depends on your goal. growth: U (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: SIMO (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, SIMO leads 9 to 3.
Which has grown faster, SIMO or U?: Over the past five years, U grew revenue faster — SIMO at a 12.49% CAGR versus U at 18.01%.
Does SIMO or U pay a bigger dividend?: SIMO pays a dividend (0.71% yield) while U does not currently pay one.
Is SIMO or U more profitable?: SIMO runs the higher net margin — SIMO at 16.02% versus U at -34.95%.
Which has been the better investment, SIMO or U?: Over the past 5-year, SIMO delivered the higher annualized total return — SIMO at 23.11% versus U at -22.81%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full SIMO analysis Full U analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Silicon Motion Technology P/E ratio Unity Software P/E ratio Silicon Motion Technology dividend yield Unity Software dividend yield Silicon Motion Technology ROE Unity Software ROE Silicon Motion Technology operating margin Unity Software operating margin Silicon Motion Technology revenue growth Unity Software revenue growth Silicon Motion Technology free cash flow Unity Software free cash flow

Silicon Motion Technology & Unity Software appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Best 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 13, 2026.