Silicon Motion Technology Corporation (SIMO) vs Tempus AI, Inc. (TEM)
SIMO leads on 6 of 8 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Silicon Motion Technology Corporation and Tempus AI, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 26, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
SIMO
Silicon Motion Technology Corporation
$325.26Technology
TEM
Tempus AI, Inc.
$54.87Technology
Total return — SIMO vs TEM
growth of $100 · last 2ySIMO +276.6%TEM +39.5%SIMO compounded faster
SIMO TEM
SIMO vs TEM: by the numbers
- •SIMO is the larger company ($10.37B vs $9.76B market cap).
- •SIMO is profitable (16.02% net margin) while TEM runs a net loss (-22.20%).
- •TEM grew revenue faster over the past five years (42.06% vs 12.49% CAGR).
- •SIMO pays a dividend (0.61% yield) while TEM does not currently pay one.
Which is better, SIMO or TEM?
Metric tally: SIMO 6 · TEM 2It depends on what you're optimizing for:
GrowthTEM(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualitySIMO(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | SIMO | TEM |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 25.33 | — |
| Forward P/E | 36.88 | — |
| P/S ratio | 3.08● | 7.20 |
| P/B ratio | 3.29● | 23.58 |
| PEG ratio | 0.17 | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 20.53 | — |
| FCF yield | 0.23% | — |
Profitability
| Metric | SIMO | TEM |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 48.09% | 69.55%● |
| Operating margin | 12.77%● | -18.13% |
| Net margin | 16.02%● | -22.20% |
| ROE | 18.76%● | -72.74% |
| ROIC | 9.22%● | -10.29% |
Dividends
| Metric | SIMO | TEM |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.61% | — |
| Payout ratio | 13.70% | — |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | SIMO | TEM |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 12.49% | 42.06%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 44.85% | — |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -42.15% | — |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 40.16% | — |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, SIMO or TEM?
- It depends on your goal. growth: TEM (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: SIMO (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, SIMO leads 6 to 2.
- Which has grown faster, SIMO or TEM?
- Over the past five years, TEM grew revenue faster — SIMO at a 12.49% CAGR versus TEM at 42.06%.
- Does SIMO or TEM pay a bigger dividend?
- SIMO pays a dividend (0.61% yield) while TEM does not currently pay one.
- Is SIMO or TEM more profitable?
- SIMO runs the higher net margin — SIMO at 16.02% versus TEM at -22.20%.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Silicon Motion Technology P/E ratioTempus AI P/E ratioSilicon Motion Technology dividend yieldTempus AI dividend yieldSilicon Motion Technology ROETempus AI ROESilicon Motion Technology operating marginTempus AI operating marginSilicon Motion Technology revenue growthTempus AI revenue growthSilicon Motion Technology free cash flowTempus AI free cash flow
Silicon Motion Technology & Tempus AI appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 26, 2026.