Silicon Motion Technology Corporation (SIMO) vs Molson Coors Beverage Company (TAP)
SIMO leads on 7 of 13 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Silicon Motion Technology Corporation and Molson Coors Beverage Company across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 25, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
SIMO
Silicon Motion Technology Corporation
$270.90TechnologyAt close: Jul 24, 2026, 4:00 PM ET
TAP
Molson Coors Beverage Company
$40.95Consumer DefensiveAt close: Jul 24, 2026, 4:00 PM ET
Total return — SIMO vs TAP
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 21ySIMO +3536.4%TAP +121.7%SIMO compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
SIMO TAP
SIMO vs TAP: by the numbers
- •SIMO is the larger company ($9.09B vs $7.68B market cap).
- •SIMO is profitable (16.02% net margin) while TAP runs a net loss (-18.85%).
- •SIMO grew revenue faster over the past five years (12.49% vs 3.44% CAGR).
- •TAP pays the higher dividend yield (4.64% vs 0.74%).
Which is better, SIMO or TAP?
Metric tally: SIMO 7 · TAP 6It depends on what you're optimizing for:
GrowthSIMO(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeTAP(higher dividend yield)
QualitySIMO(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | SIMO | TAP |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 21.10 | — |
| Forward P/E | 30.51 | 8.68● |
| P/S ratio | 2.57 | 0.69● |
| P/B ratio | 2.74 | 0.77● |
| PEG ratio | 0.17 | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 16.83 | — |
| FCF yield | 0.28% | 15.04%● |
Profitability
| Metric | SIMO | TAP |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 48.09%● | 37.83% |
| Operating margin | 12.77%● | -20.28% |
| Net margin | 16.02%● | -18.85% |
| ROE | 18.76%● | -20.98% |
| ROIC | 9.22%● | -10.20% |
Dividends
| Metric | SIMO | TAP |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.74% | 4.64%● |
| Payout ratio | 13.70% | — |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | SIMO | TAP |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 12.49%● | 3.44% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 44.85% | — |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -42.15% | -0.97%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 37.15%● | -0.67% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, SIMO or TAP?
- It depends on your goal. growth: SIMO (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: TAP (higher dividend yield); quality: SIMO (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, SIMO leads 7 to 6.
- Which has grown faster, SIMO or TAP?
- Over the past five years, SIMO grew revenue faster — SIMO at a 12.49% CAGR versus TAP at 3.44%.
- Does SIMO or TAP pay a bigger dividend?
- SIMO yields 0.74% and TAP yields 4.64% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is SIMO or TAP more profitable?
- SIMO runs the higher net margin — SIMO at 16.02% versus TAP at -18.85%.
- Which has been the better investment, SIMO or TAP?
- Over the past 10-year, SIMO delivered the higher annualized total return — SIMO at 20.85% versus TAP at -6.30%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Silicon Motion Technology P/E ratioMolson Coors Beverage P/E ratioSilicon Motion Technology dividend yieldMolson Coors Beverage dividend yieldSilicon Motion Technology ROEMolson Coors Beverage ROESilicon Motion Technology operating marginMolson Coors Beverage operating marginSilicon Motion Technology revenue growthMolson Coors Beverage revenue growthSilicon Motion Technology free cash flowMolson Coors Beverage free cash flow
Silicon Motion Technology & Molson Coors Beverage appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 25, 2026.