Silicon Motion Technology Corporation (SIMO) vs Snap Inc. (SNAP)
SIMO leads on 6 of 10 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Silicon Motion Technology Corporation and Snap Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 25, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
SIMO
Silicon Motion Technology Corporation
$270.90TechnologyAt close: Jul 24, 2026, 4:00 PM ET
SNAP
Snap Inc.
$4.35Communication ServicesAt close: Jul 24, 2026, 4:00 PM ET
Total return — SIMO vs SNAP
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 9ySIMO +729.4%SNAP -82.2%SIMO compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
SIMO SNAP
SIMO vs SNAP: by the numbers
- •SIMO is the larger company ($9.09B vs $7.36B market cap).
- •SIMO is profitable (16.02% net margin) while SNAP runs a net loss (-6.72%).
- •SNAP grew revenue faster over the past five years (16.73% vs 12.49% CAGR).
- •SIMO pays a dividend (0.74% yield) while SNAP does not currently pay one.
Which is better, SIMO or SNAP?
Metric tally: SIMO 6 · SNAP 4It depends on what you're optimizing for:
GrowthSNAP(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualitySIMO(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | SIMO | SNAP |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 21.10 | — |
| Forward P/E | 30.51 | — |
| P/S ratio | 2.57 | 1.20● |
| P/B ratio | 2.74● | 3.52 |
| PEG ratio | 0.17 | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 16.83 | — |
| FCF yield | 0.28% | 8.29%● |
Profitability
| Metric | SIMO | SNAP |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 48.09% | 55.77%● |
| Operating margin | 12.77%● | -6.77% |
| Net margin | 16.02%● | -6.72% |
| ROE | 18.76%● | -19.66% |
| ROIC | 9.22%● | -8.20% |
Dividends
| Metric | SIMO | SNAP |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.74% | — |
| Payout ratio | 13.70% | — |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | SIMO | SNAP |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 12.49% | 16.73%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 44.85% | — |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -42.15% | — |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 37.15%● | -43.84% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, SIMO or SNAP?
- It depends on your goal. growth: SNAP (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: SIMO (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, SIMO leads 6 to 4.
- Which has grown faster, SIMO or SNAP?
- Over the past five years, SNAP grew revenue faster — SIMO at a 12.49% CAGR versus SNAP at 16.73%.
- Does SIMO or SNAP pay a bigger dividend?
- SIMO pays a dividend (0.74% yield) while SNAP does not currently pay one.
- Is SIMO or SNAP more profitable?
- SIMO runs the higher net margin — SIMO at 16.02% versus SNAP at -6.72%.
- Which has been the better investment, SIMO or SNAP?
- Over the past 5-year, SIMO delivered the higher annualized total return — SIMO at 20.85% versus SNAP at -43.84%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Silicon Motion Technology P/E ratioSnap P/E ratioSilicon Motion Technology dividend yieldSnap dividend yieldSilicon Motion Technology ROESnap ROESilicon Motion Technology operating marginSnap operating marginSilicon Motion Technology revenue growthSnap revenue growthSilicon Motion Technology free cash flowSnap free cash flow
Silicon Motion Technology & Snap appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 25, 2026.