Smithfield Foods, Inc. (SFD) vs Molson Coors Beverage Company (TAP)
SFD and TAP are evenly matched — 6 metrics each of 12.
A side-by-side comparison of Smithfield Foods, Inc. and Molson Coors Beverage Company across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 16, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
SFD
Smithfield Foods, Inc.
$25.62Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Jul 16, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
TAP
Molson Coors Beverage Company
$41.78Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Jul 16, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — SFD vs TAP
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 1ySFD +33.9%TAP -21.0%SFD compounded faster
SFD TAP
SFD vs TAP: by the numbers
- •SFD is the larger company ($10.08B vs $7.84B market cap).
- •SFD is profitable (6.48% net margin) while TAP runs a net loss (-18.85%).
- •TAP grew revenue faster over the past five years (3.44% vs 0.92% CAGR).
- •TAP pays the higher dividend yield (4.80% vs 4.39%).
Which is better, SFD or TAP?
Metric tally: SFD 6 · TAP 6It depends on what you're optimizing for:
GrowthTAP(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeTAP(higher dividend yield)
QualitySFD(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | SFD | TAP |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 10.01 | — |
| Forward P/E | 9.67 | 8.39● |
| P/S ratio | 0.65● | 0.67 |
| P/B ratio | 1.47 | 0.75● |
| PEG ratio | 2.42 | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 6.64 | — |
| FCF yield | 8.05% | 15.55%● |
Profitability
| Metric | SFD | TAP |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 13.44% | 37.83%● |
| Operating margin | 8.62%● | -20.28% |
| Net margin | 6.48%● | -18.85% |
| ROE | 14.69%● | -20.98% |
| ROIC | 9.58%● | -10.20% |
Dividends
| Metric | SFD | TAP |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 4.39% | 4.80%● |
| Payout ratio | 44.82% | — |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | SFD | TAP |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 0.92% | 3.44%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 7.75% | — |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 5.08%● | -0.97% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | — | -0.71% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, SFD or TAP?
- It depends on your goal. growth: TAP (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: TAP (higher dividend yield); quality: SFD (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, they are evenly matched.
- Which has grown faster, SFD or TAP?
- Over the past five years, TAP grew revenue faster — SFD at a 0.92% CAGR versus TAP at 3.44%.
- Does SFD or TAP pay a bigger dividend?
- SFD yields 4.39% and TAP yields 4.80% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is SFD or TAP more profitable?
- SFD runs the higher net margin — SFD at 6.48% versus TAP at -18.85%.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Smithfield Foods P/E ratioMolson Coors Beverage P/E ratioSmithfield Foods dividend yieldMolson Coors Beverage dividend yieldSmithfield Foods ROEMolson Coors Beverage ROESmithfield Foods operating marginMolson Coors Beverage operating marginSmithfield Foods revenue growthMolson Coors Beverage revenue growthSmithfield Foods free cash flowMolson Coors Beverage free cash flow
Smithfield Foods & Molson Coors Beverage appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 16, 2026.