Schneider Electric S.E. (SBGSY) vs Vertiv Holdings Co (VRT)
VRT leads on 9 of 17 compared metrics, though SBGSY is the cheaper stock.
A side-by-side comparison of Schneider Electric S.E. and Vertiv Holdings Co across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 25, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
SBGSY
Schneider Electric S.E.
$63.53Industrials
VRT
Vertiv Holdings Co
$316.43Industrials
Total return — SBGSY vs VRT
growth of $100 · last 8ySBGSY +297.6%VRT +3112.5%VRT compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
SBGSY VRT
SBGSY vs VRT: by the numbers
- •SBGSY is the larger company ($178.64B vs $125.40B market cap).
- •SBGSY trades at the lower earnings multiple (19.22 vs 79.51 P/E).
- •VRT converts more revenue to profit (14.37% vs 10.74% net margin).
- •VRT grew revenue faster over the past five years (18.86% vs 7.72% CAGR).
- •SBGSY pays the higher dividend yield (1.55% vs 0.07%).
Which is better, SBGSY or VRT?
Metric tally: SBGSY 8 · VRT 9It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueSBGSY(lower P/E)
GrowthVRT(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeSBGSY(higher dividend yield)
QualityVRT(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | SBGSY | VRT |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 19.22● | 79.51 |
| Forward P/E | 27.73● | 35.98 |
| P/S ratio | 2.07● | 11.44 |
| P/B ratio | 6.37● | 29.23 |
| PEG ratio | 1.47 | 0.28● |
| EV / EBITDA | 11.42● | 53.77 |
| FCF yield | 5.96%● | 1.86% |
Profitability
| Metric | SBGSY | VRT |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 41.69%● | 36.16% |
| Operating margin | 16.35% | 18.54%● |
| Net margin | 10.74% | 14.37%● |
| ROE | 33.03% | 36.71%● |
| ROIC | 10.96% | 18.55%● |
Dividends
| Metric | SBGSY | VRT |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 1.55%● | 0.07% |
| Payout ratio | 56.55% | 6.45% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | SBGSY | VRT |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 7.72% | 18.86%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 13.07% | 79.41%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 5.65% | 41.85%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 16.28% | 64.52%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, SBGSY or VRT?
- It depends on your goal. value: SBGSY (lower P/E); growth: VRT (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: SBGSY (higher dividend yield); quality: VRT (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, VRT leads 9 to 8.
- Is SBGSY or VRT cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, SBGSY is cheaper: SBGSY trades at a 19.22 P/E and VRT at 79.51.
- Which has grown faster, SBGSY or VRT?
- Over the past five years, VRT grew revenue faster — SBGSY at a 7.72% CAGR versus VRT at 18.86%.
- Does SBGSY or VRT pay a bigger dividend?
- SBGSY yields 1.55% and VRT yields 0.07% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is SBGSY or VRT more profitable?
- VRT runs the higher net margin — SBGSY at 10.74% versus VRT at 14.37%.
- Which has been the better investment, SBGSY or VRT?
- Over the past 5-year, VRT delivered the higher annualized total return — SBGSY at 21.55% versus VRT at 64.52%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Schneider Electric S.E. P/E ratioVertiv P/E ratioSchneider Electric S.E. dividend yieldVertiv dividend yieldSchneider Electric S.E. ROEVertiv ROESchneider Electric S.E. operating marginVertiv operating marginSchneider Electric S.E. revenue growthVertiv revenue growthSchneider Electric S.E. free cash flowVertiv free cash flow
Schneider Electric S.E. & Vertiv appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 25, 2026.