On trailing earnings, RS is cheaper: RS trades at a 25.18 P/E and WY at 46.02.

Which has grown faster, RS or WY?

Over the past five years, RS grew revenue faster — RS at a 10.33% CAGR versus WY at -3.60%.

Does RS or WY pay a bigger dividend?

RS yields 1.30% and WY yields 3.32% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is RS or WY more profitable?

WY runs the higher net margin — RS at 5.43% versus WY at 5.74%.

Which has been the better investment, RS or WY?

Over the past 10-year, RS delivered the higher annualized total return — RS at 20.24% versus WY at 2.44%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. (RS) vs Weyerhaeuser Company (WY)

RS leads on 11 of 15 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. and Weyerhaeuser Company across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 29, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co.

$19.69B

$385.78Basic Materials

Weyerhaeuser Company

$18.25B

$25.31Basic Materials

Total return — RS vs WY

growth of $100 · last 30y

RS +4559.2%WY -40.4%RS compounded faster

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

RS WY

RS vs WY: by the numbers

•RS is the larger company ($19.69B vs $18.25B market cap).
•RS trades at the lower earnings multiple (25.18 vs 46.02 P/E).
•WY converts more revenue to profit (5.74% vs 5.43% net margin).
•RS grew revenue faster over the past five years (10.33% vs -3.60% CAGR).
•WY pays the higher dividend yield (3.32% vs 1.30%).

Which is better, RS or WY?

Metric tally: RS 11 · WY 4

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueRS(lower P/E)

GrowthRS(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

IncomeWY(higher dividend yield)

QualityRS(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	RS	WY
P/E ratio	25.18●	46.02
Forward P/E	17.95●	73.57
P/S ratio	1.35●	2.64
P/B ratio	2.81	1.94●
PEG ratio	1.28	—
EV / EBITDA	15.65●	22.49
FCF yield	3.05%	—

Profitability

Metric	RS	WY
Gross margin	27.22%●	13.41%
Operating margin	7.52%	7.70%●
Net margin	5.43%	5.74%●
ROE	11.32%●	4.21%
ROIC	8.16%●	2.93%

Dividends

Metric	RS	WY
Dividend yield	1.30%	3.32%●
Payout ratio	35.54%	186.67%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	RS	WY
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	10.33%●	-3.60%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	19.64%●	-15.91%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	-9.42%●	-17.08%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	22.21%●	-2.57%

Frequently asked

Which is better, RS or WY?: It depends on your goal. value: RS (lower P/E); growth: RS (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: WY (higher dividend yield); quality: RS (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, RS leads 11 to 4.
Is RS or WY cheaper?: On trailing earnings, RS is cheaper: RS trades at a 25.18 P/E and WY at 46.02.
Which has grown faster, RS or WY?: Over the past five years, RS grew revenue faster — RS at a 10.33% CAGR versus WY at -3.60%.
Does RS or WY pay a bigger dividend?: RS yields 1.30% and WY yields 3.32% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is RS or WY more profitable?: WY runs the higher net margin — RS at 5.43% versus WY at 5.74%.
Which has been the better investment, RS or WY?: Over the past 10-year, RS delivered the higher annualized total return — RS at 20.24% versus WY at 2.44%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full RS analysis Full WY analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Reliance Steel & Aluminum P/E ratio Weyerhaeuser P/E ratio Reliance Steel & Aluminum dividend yield Weyerhaeuser dividend yield Reliance Steel & Aluminum ROE Weyerhaeuser ROE Reliance Steel & Aluminum operating margin Weyerhaeuser operating margin Reliance Steel & Aluminum revenue growth Weyerhaeuser revenue growth Reliance Steel & Aluminum free cash flow Weyerhaeuser free cash flow

Reliance Steel & Aluminum & Weyerhaeuser appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Best 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 29, 2026.