Is RPM or RS cheaper?

On trailing earnings, RPM is cheaper: RPM trades at a 19.92 P/E and RS at 24.93.

Which has grown faster, RPM or RS?

Over the past five years, RS grew revenue faster — RPM at a 5.79% CAGR versus RS at 10.33%.

Does RPM or RS pay a bigger dividend?

RPM yields 2.09% and RS yields 1.31% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is RPM or RS more profitable?

RPM runs the higher net margin — RPM at 8.63% versus RS at 5.43%.

Which has been the better investment, RPM or RS?

Over the past 10-year, RS delivered the higher annualized total return — RPM at 9.39% versus RS at 19.20%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

RPM International Inc. (RPM) vs Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. (RS)

RPM leads on 11 of 16 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of RPM International Inc. and Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 9, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

RPM

RPM International Inc.

$13.19B

$103.36Basic Materials

Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co.

$19.22B

$376.50Basic Materials

Total return — RPM vs RS

growth of $100 · last 30y

RPM +727.9%RS +4866.3%RS compounded faster

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

RPM RS

RPM vs RS: by the numbers

•RS is the larger company ($19.22B vs $13.19B market cap).
•RPM trades at the lower earnings multiple (19.92 vs 24.93 P/E).
•RPM converts more revenue to profit (8.63% vs 5.43% net margin).
•RS grew revenue faster over the past five years (10.33% vs 5.79% CAGR).
•RPM pays the higher dividend yield (2.09% vs 1.31%).

Which is better, RPM or RS?

Metric tally: RPM 11 · RS 5

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueRPM(lower P/E)

GrowthRS(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

IncomeRPM(higher dividend yield)

QualityRPM(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	RPM	RS
P/E ratio	19.92●	24.93
Forward P/E	18.79	19.04
P/S ratio	1.71	1.34●
P/B ratio	4.19	2.79●
PEG ratio	1.21●	1.27
EV / EBITDA	13.93●	15.51
FCF yield	4.36%●	3.08%

Profitability

Metric	RPM	RS
Gross margin	41.36%●	27.22%
Operating margin	11.99%●	7.52%
Net margin	8.63%●	5.43%
ROE	21.16%●	11.32%
ROIC	12.50%●	8.16%

Dividends

Metric	RPM	RS
Dividend yield	2.09%●	1.31%
Payout ratio	40.15%	35.54%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	RPM	RS
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	5.79%	10.33%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	18.02%	19.64%●
FCF CAGR (5Y)	-3.15%●	-9.42%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	4.59%	22.77%●

Frequently asked

Which is better, RPM or RS?: It depends on your goal. value: RPM (lower P/E); growth: RS (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: RPM (higher dividend yield); quality: RPM (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, RPM leads 11 to 5.
Is RPM or RS cheaper?: On trailing earnings, RPM is cheaper: RPM trades at a 19.92 P/E and RS at 24.93.
Which has grown faster, RPM or RS?: Over the past five years, RS grew revenue faster — RPM at a 5.79% CAGR versus RS at 10.33%.
Does RPM or RS pay a bigger dividend?: RPM yields 2.09% and RS yields 1.31% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is RPM or RS more profitable?: RPM runs the higher net margin — RPM at 8.63% versus RS at 5.43%.
Which has been the better investment, RPM or RS?: Over the past 10-year, RS delivered the higher annualized total return — RPM at 9.39% versus RS at 19.20%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full RPM analysis Full RS analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

RPM International P/E ratio Reliance Steel & Aluminum P/E ratio RPM International dividend yield Reliance Steel & Aluminum dividend yield RPM International ROE Reliance Steel & Aluminum ROE RPM International operating margin Reliance Steel & Aluminum operating margin RPM International revenue growth Reliance Steel & Aluminum revenue growth RPM International free cash flow Reliance Steel & Aluminum free cash flow

RPM International & Reliance Steel & Aluminum appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Dividend Aristocrats Highest FCF Yield Stocks Best 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 9, 2026.