Rollins, Inc. (ROL) vs Snap-on Incorporated (SNA)
SNA leads on 11 of 16 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Rollins, Inc. and Snap-on Incorporated across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 22, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
ROL
Rollins, Inc.
$43.47IndustrialsDelayed quote: Jul 22, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
SNA
Snap-on Incorporated
$406.17IndustrialsDelayed quote: Jul 22, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — ROL vs SNA
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 30yROL +5293.1%SNA +2933.4%ROL compounded faster
ROL SNA
ROL vs SNA: by the numbers
- •SNA is the larger company ($21.04B vs $20.93B market cap).
- •SNA trades at the lower earnings multiple (20.87 vs 40.24 P/E).
- •SNA converts more revenue to profit (19.99% vs 13.77% net margin).
- •ROL grew revenue faster over the past five years (11.73% vs 5.87% CAGR).
- •SNA pays the higher dividend yield (2.34% vs 1.62%).
Which is better, ROL or SNA?
Metric tally: ROL 5 · SNA 11It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueSNA(lower P/E)
GrowthROL(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeSNA(higher dividend yield)
QualityROL(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | ROL | SNA |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 40.24 | 20.87● |
| Forward P/E | 35.67 | 21.14● |
| P/S ratio | 5.49 | 4.16● |
| P/B ratio | 15.28 | 3.57● |
| PEG ratio | 4.07 | 1.89● |
| EV / EBITDA | 25.72 | 15.25● |
| FCF yield | 2.94% | 5.06%● |
Profitability
| Metric | ROL | SNA |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 51.78% | 51.30% |
| Operating margin | 18.99% | 24.71%● |
| Net margin | 13.77% | 19.99%● |
| ROE | 38.31%● | 17.18% |
| ROIC | 20.95%● | 13.79% |
Dividends
| Metric | ROL | SNA |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 1.62% | 2.34%● |
| Payout ratio | 65.37% | 48.46% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | ROL | SNA |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 11.73%● | 5.87% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 15.08%● | 11.05% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 7.19%● | 0.58% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 4.57% | 16.03%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, ROL or SNA?
- It depends on your goal. value: SNA (lower P/E); growth: ROL (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: SNA (higher dividend yield); quality: ROL (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, SNA leads 11 to 5.
- Is ROL or SNA cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, SNA is cheaper: ROL trades at a 40.24 P/E and SNA at 20.87.
- Which has grown faster, ROL or SNA?
- Over the past five years, ROL grew revenue faster — ROL at a 11.73% CAGR versus SNA at 5.87%.
- Does ROL or SNA pay a bigger dividend?
- ROL yields 1.62% and SNA yields 2.34% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is ROL or SNA more profitable?
- SNA runs the higher net margin — ROL at 13.77% versus SNA at 19.99%.
- Which has been the better investment, ROL or SNA?
- Over the past 10-year, ROL delivered the higher annualized total return — ROL at 14.40% versus SNA at 12.67%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Rollins P/E ratioSnap-on P/E ratioRollins dividend yieldSnap-on dividend yieldRollins ROESnap-on ROERollins operating marginSnap-on operating marginRollins revenue growthSnap-on revenue growthRollins free cash flowSnap-on free cash flow
Rollins & Snap-on appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 22, 2026.