Rockwell Automation, Inc. (ROK) vs Thomson Reuters Corporation (TRI)
TRI leads on 12 of 16 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Rockwell Automation, Inc. and Thomson Reuters Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 16, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
ROK
Rockwell Automation, Inc.
$464.95IndustrialsDelayed quote: Jul 16, 2026, 3:05 PM EDT
TRI
Thomson Reuters Corporation
$99.13IndustrialsDelayed quote: Jul 16, 2026, 3:05 PM EDT
Total return — ROK vs TRI
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 24yROK +3545.4%TRI +389.5%ROK compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
ROK TRI
ROK vs TRI: by the numbers
- •ROK is the larger company ($51.74B vs $43.27B market cap).
- •TRI trades at the lower earnings multiple (27.93 vs 48.02 P/E).
- •TRI converts more revenue to profit (19.93% vs 12.36% net margin).
- •ROK grew revenue faster over the past five years (6.91% vs 4.86% CAGR).
- •TRI pays the higher dividend yield (4.13% vs 1.18%).
Which is better, ROK or TRI?
Metric tally: ROK 4 · TRI 12It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueTRI(lower P/E)
GrowthROK(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeTRI(higher dividend yield)
QualityROK(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | ROK | TRI |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 48.02 | 27.93● |
| Forward P/E | 35.45 | 22.05● |
| P/S ratio | 5.91 | 5.46● |
| P/B ratio | 14.77 | 3.53● |
| PEG ratio | — | 3.87 |
| EV / EBITDA | 27.77 | 14.66● |
| FCF yield | 2.57% | 5.00%● |
Profitability
| Metric | ROK | TRI |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 52.53% | 75.81%● |
| Operating margin | 19.08% | 26.66%● |
| Net margin | 12.36% | 19.93%● |
| ROE | 30.89%● | 12.89% |
| ROIC | 13.71%● | 10.13% |
Dividends
| Metric | ROK | TRI |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 1.18% | 4.13%● |
| Payout ratio | 70.87% | 116.05% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | ROK | TRI |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 6.91%● | 4.86% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -2.73% | 7.22%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 2.95% | 9.45%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 11.44%● | -0.27% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, ROK or TRI?
- It depends on your goal. value: TRI (lower P/E); growth: ROK (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: TRI (higher dividend yield); quality: ROK (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, TRI leads 12 to 4.
- Is ROK or TRI cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, TRI is cheaper: ROK trades at a 48.02 P/E and TRI at 27.93.
- Which has grown faster, ROK or TRI?
- Over the past five years, ROK grew revenue faster — ROK at a 6.91% CAGR versus TRI at 4.86%.
- Does ROK or TRI pay a bigger dividend?
- ROK yields 1.18% and TRI yields 4.13% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is ROK or TRI more profitable?
- TRI runs the higher net margin — ROK at 12.36% versus TRI at 19.93%.
- Which has been the better investment, ROK or TRI?
- Over the past 10-year, ROK delivered the higher annualized total return — ROK at 16.72% versus TRI at 9.04%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Rockwell Automation P/E ratioThomson Reuters P/E ratioRockwell Automation dividend yieldThomson Reuters dividend yieldRockwell Automation ROEThomson Reuters ROERockwell Automation operating marginThomson Reuters operating marginRockwell Automation revenue growthThomson Reuters revenue growthRockwell Automation free cash flowThomson Reuters free cash flow
Rockwell Automation & Thomson Reuters appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 16, 2026.