Which has grown faster, RMBS or WULF?

Over the past five years, WULF grew revenue faster — RMBS at a 23.51% CAGR versus WULF at 66.83%.

Is RMBS or WULF more profitable?

RMBS runs the higher net margin — RMBS at 31.89% versus WULF at -611.46%.

Which has been the better investment, RMBS or WULF?

Over the past 10-year, RMBS delivered the higher annualized total return — RMBS at 26.51% versus WULF at 11.07%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Rambus Inc. (RMBS) vs TeraWulf Inc. (WULF)

RMBS leads on 9 of 11 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Rambus Inc. and TeraWulf Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 25, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Total return — RMBS vs WULF

growth of $100 · last 29y

RMBS +1535.6%WULF +578.6%RMBS compounded faster

RMBS WULF

RMBS vs WULF: by the numbers

•RMBS is the larger company ($13.38B vs $12.91B market cap).
•RMBS is profitable (31.89% net margin) while WULF runs a net loss (-611.46%).
•WULF grew revenue faster over the past five years (66.83% vs 23.51% CAGR).

Which is better, RMBS or WULF?

Metric tally: RMBS 9 · WULF 2

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

GrowthWULF(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityRMBS(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	RMBS	WULF
P/E ratio	58.90	—
Forward P/E	41.48	—
P/S ratio	18.82●	65.59
P/B ratio	9.74●	73.78
PEG ratio	1.53	—
EV / EBITDA	42.32	—
FCF yield	2.47%	—

Profitability

Metric	RMBS	WULF
Gross margin	77.03%●	64.02%
Operating margin	35.89%●	-147.04%
Net margin	31.89%●	-611.46%
ROE	16.51%●	-470.94%
ROIC	15.03%●	-3.18%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	RMBS	WULF
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	23.51%	66.83%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	48.76%●	-27.04%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	16.48%	26.65%●
Total return CAGR (5Y)	39.94%●	11.84%

Frequently asked

Which is better, RMBS or WULF?: It depends on your goal. growth: WULF (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: RMBS (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, RMBS leads 9 to 2.
Which has grown faster, RMBS or WULF?: Over the past five years, WULF grew revenue faster — RMBS at a 23.51% CAGR versus WULF at 66.83%.
Is RMBS or WULF more profitable?: RMBS runs the higher net margin — RMBS at 31.89% versus WULF at -611.46%.
Which has been the better investment, RMBS or WULF?: Over the past 10-year, RMBS delivered the higher annualized total return — RMBS at 26.51% versus WULF at 11.07%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full RMBS analysis Full WULF analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Rambus P/E ratio TeraWulf P/E ratio Rambus dividend yield TeraWulf dividend yield Rambus ROE TeraWulf ROE Rambus operating margin TeraWulf operating margin Rambus revenue growth TeraWulf revenue growth Rambus free cash flow TeraWulf free cash flow

Rambus & TeraWulf appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest Operating Margin Stocks Best 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 25, 2026.