Rambus Inc. (RMBS) vs Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. (SWK)
RMBS leads on 9 of 16 compared metrics, though SWK is the cheaper stock.
A side-by-side comparison of Rambus Inc. and Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 14, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
Total return — RMBS vs SWK
growth of $100 · last 29yRMBS +1838.0%SWK +118.6%RMBS compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
RMBS SWK
RMBS vs SWK: by the numbers
- •RMBS is the larger company ($15.85B vs $13.00B market cap).
- •SWK trades at the lower earnings multiple (34.27 vs 69.79 P/E).
- •RMBS converts more revenue to profit (31.89% vs 2.44% net margin).
- •RMBS grew revenue faster over the past five years (23.51% vs 0.68% CAGR).
- •SWK pays a dividend (3.97% yield) while RMBS does not currently pay one.
Which is better, RMBS or SWK?
Metric tally: RMBS 9 · SWK 7It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueSWK(lower P/E)
GrowthRMBS(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityRMBS(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | RMBS | SWK |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 69.79 | 34.27● |
| Forward P/E | 49.34 | 15.62● |
| P/S ratio | 22.30 | 0.84● |
| P/B ratio | 11.54 | 1.42● |
| PEG ratio | 1.53 | 0.82● |
| EV / EBITDA | 52.03 | 15.04● |
| FCF yield | 2.08% | 5.69%● |
Profitability
| Metric | RMBS | SWK |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 77.03%● | 30.03% |
| Operating margin | 35.89%● | 7.79% |
| Net margin | 31.89%● | 2.44% |
| ROE | 16.51%● | 4.13% |
| ROIC | 15.03%● | 6.41% |
Dividends
| Metric | RMBS | SWK |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | — | 3.97% |
| Payout ratio | — | 125.28% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | RMBS | SWK |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 23.51%● | 0.68% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 48.76%● | -19.52% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 16.48%● | -17.64% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 49.06%● | -13.22% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, RMBS or SWK?
- It depends on your goal. value: SWK (lower P/E); growth: RMBS (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: RMBS (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, RMBS leads 9 to 7.
- Is RMBS or SWK cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, SWK is cheaper: RMBS trades at a 69.79 P/E and SWK at 34.27.
- Which has grown faster, RMBS or SWK?
- Over the past five years, RMBS grew revenue faster — RMBS at a 23.51% CAGR versus SWK at 0.68%.
- Does RMBS or SWK pay a bigger dividend?
- SWK pays a dividend (3.97% yield) while RMBS does not currently pay one.
- Is RMBS or SWK more profitable?
- RMBS runs the higher net margin — RMBS at 31.89% versus SWK at 2.44%.
- Which has been the better investment, RMBS or SWK?
- Over the past 10-year, RMBS delivered the higher annualized total return — RMBS at 28.27% versus SWK at -0.31%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Rambus P/E ratioStanley Black & Decker P/E ratioRambus dividend yieldStanley Black & Decker dividend yieldRambus ROEStanley Black & Decker ROERambus operating marginStanley Black & Decker operating marginRambus revenue growthStanley Black & Decker revenue growthRambus free cash flowStanley Black & Decker free cash flow
Rambus & Stanley Black & Decker appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 14, 2026.