Which has grown faster, RL or ZS?

Over the past five years, ZS grew revenue faster — RL at a 13.01% CAGR versus ZS at 39.45%.

Does RL or ZS pay a bigger dividend?

RL pays a dividend (0.90% yield) while ZS does not currently pay one.

Is RL or ZS more profitable?

RL runs the higher net margin — RL at 11.60% versus ZS at -2.44%.

Which has been the better investment, RL or ZS?

Over the past 5-year, RL delivered the higher annualized total return — RL at 17.77% versus ZS at -9.02%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Ralph Lauren Corporation (RL) vs Zscaler, Inc. (ZS)

RL leads on 8 of 12 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Ralph Lauren Corporation and Zscaler, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 15, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Ralph Lauren Corporation

$24.64B

$403.98Consumer Cyclical

Zscaler, Inc.

$20.94B

$129.52Technology

Total return — RL vs ZS

growth of $100 · last 8y

RL +270.1%ZS +292.5%ZS compounded faster

RL ZS

RL vs ZS: by the numbers

•RL is the larger company ($24.64B vs $20.94B market cap).
•RL is profitable (11.60% net margin) while ZS runs a net loss (-2.44%).
•ZS grew revenue faster over the past five years (39.45% vs 13.01% CAGR).
•RL pays a dividend (0.90% yield) while ZS does not currently pay one.

Which is better, RL or ZS?

Metric tally: RL 8 · ZS 4

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

GrowthZS(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityRL(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	RL	ZS
P/E ratio	26.74	—
Forward P/E	22.03●	28.16
P/S ratio	3.10●	6.56
P/B ratio	8.86	8.80
PEG ratio	0.71	—
EV / EBITDA	22.22●	314.12
FCF yield	2.96%	4.61%●

Profitability

Metric	RL	ZS
Gross margin	69.87%	76.67%●
Operating margin	14.53%●	-4.73%
Net margin	11.60%●	-2.44%
ROE	33.13%●	-3.27%
ROIC	19.62%●	-3.18%

Dividends

Metric	RL	ZS
Dividend yield	0.90%	—
Payout ratio	23.67%	—

Growth (annualized)

Metric	RL	ZS
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	13.01%	39.45%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	20.37%	—
FCF CAGR (5Y)	22.25%	49.89%●
Total return CAGR (5Y)	29.56%●	-9.02%

Frequently asked

Which is better, RL or ZS?: It depends on your goal. growth: ZS (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: RL (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, RL leads 8 to 4.
Which has grown faster, RL or ZS?: Over the past five years, ZS grew revenue faster — RL at a 13.01% CAGR versus ZS at 39.45%.
Does RL or ZS pay a bigger dividend?: RL pays a dividend (0.90% yield) while ZS does not currently pay one.
Is RL or ZS more profitable?: RL runs the higher net margin — RL at 11.60% versus ZS at -2.44%.
Which has been the better investment, RL or ZS?: Over the past 5-year, RL delivered the higher annualized total return — RL at 17.77% versus ZS at -9.02%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full RL analysis Full ZS analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Ralph Lauren P/E ratio Zscaler P/E ratio Ralph Lauren dividend yield Zscaler dividend yield Ralph Lauren ROE Zscaler ROE Ralph Lauren operating margin Zscaler operating margin Ralph Lauren revenue growth Zscaler revenue growth Ralph Lauren free cash flow Zscaler free cash flow

Ralph Lauren & Zscaler appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 15, 2026.