Is RL or VRSK cheaper?

On trailing earnings, RL is cheaper: RL trades at a 26.74 P/E and VRSK at 27.98.

Which has grown faster, RL or VRSK?

Over the past five years, RL grew revenue faster — RL at a 13.01% CAGR versus VRSK at 1.92%.

Does RL or VRSK pay a bigger dividend?

RL yields 0.90% and VRSK yields 1.03% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is RL or VRSK more profitable?

VRSK runs the higher net margin — RL at 11.60% versus VRSK at 29.34%.

Which has been the better investment, RL or VRSK?

Over the past 10-year, RL delivered the higher annualized total return — RL at 17.77% versus VRSK at 9.36%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Ralph Lauren Corporation (RL) vs Verisk Analytics, Inc. (VRSK)

RL leads on 9 of 16 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Ralph Lauren Corporation and Verisk Analytics, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 15, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Ralph Lauren Corporation

$24.64B

$403.98Consumer Cyclical

VRSK

Verisk Analytics, Inc.

$24.08B

$183.80Technology

Total return — RL vs VRSK

growth of $100 · last 17y

RL +436.9%VRSK +575.2%VRSK compounded faster

RL VRSK

RL vs VRSK: by the numbers

•RL is the larger company ($24.64B vs $24.08B market cap).
•RL trades at the lower earnings multiple (26.74 vs 27.98 P/E).
•VRSK converts more revenue to profit (29.34% vs 11.60% net margin).
•RL grew revenue faster over the past five years (13.01% vs 1.92% CAGR).
•VRSK pays the higher dividend yield (1.03% vs 0.90%).

Which is better, RL or VRSK?

Metric tally: RL 9 · VRSK 7

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueRL(lower P/E)

GrowthRL(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

IncomeVRSK(higher dividend yield)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	RL	VRSK
P/E ratio	26.74●	27.98
Forward P/E	22.03	21.23●
P/S ratio	3.10●	8.01
P/B ratio	8.86●	82.71
PEG ratio	0.71●	3.39
EV / EBITDA	22.22	17.33●
FCF yield	2.96%	4.54%●

Profitability

Metric	RL	VRSK
Gross margin	69.87%●	67.44%
Operating margin	14.53%	44.87%●
Net margin	11.60%	29.34%●
ROE	33.13%	293.95%●
ROIC	19.62%	19.56%

Dividends

Metric	RL	VRSK
Dividend yield	0.90%	1.03%●
Payout ratio	23.67%	29.19%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	RL	VRSK
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	13.01%●	1.92%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	20.37%●	8.25%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	22.25%●	4.58%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	29.56%●	1.98%

Frequently asked

Which is better, RL or VRSK?: It depends on your goal. value: RL (lower P/E); growth: RL (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: VRSK (higher dividend yield). Across all compared metrics, RL leads 9 to 7.
Is RL or VRSK cheaper?: On trailing earnings, RL is cheaper: RL trades at a 26.74 P/E and VRSK at 27.98.
Which has grown faster, RL or VRSK?: Over the past five years, RL grew revenue faster — RL at a 13.01% CAGR versus VRSK at 1.92%.
Does RL or VRSK pay a bigger dividend?: RL yields 0.90% and VRSK yields 1.03% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is RL or VRSK more profitable?: VRSK runs the higher net margin — RL at 11.60% versus VRSK at 29.34%.
Which has been the better investment, RL or VRSK?: Over the past 10-year, RL delivered the higher annualized total return — RL at 17.77% versus VRSK at 9.36%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full RL analysis Full VRSK analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Ralph Lauren P/E ratio Verisk Analytics P/E ratio Ralph Lauren dividend yield Verisk Analytics dividend yield Ralph Lauren ROE Verisk Analytics ROE Ralph Lauren operating margin Verisk Analytics operating margin Ralph Lauren revenue growth Verisk Analytics revenue growth Ralph Lauren free cash flow Verisk Analytics free cash flow

Ralph Lauren & Verisk Analytics appear in these rankings

Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest Operating Margin Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 15, 2026.