Is PWR or SMEGF cheaper?

On trailing earnings, SMEGF is cheaper: PWR trades at a 96.33 P/E and SMEGF at 65.80.

Which has grown faster, PWR or SMEGF?

Over the past five years, PWR grew revenue faster — PWR at a 21.91% CAGR versus SMEGF at 7.98%.

Does PWR or SMEGF pay a bigger dividend?

PWR yields 0.06% and SMEGF yields 0.42% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is PWR or SMEGF more profitable?

SMEGF runs the higher net margin — PWR at 3.72% versus SMEGF at 6.15%.

Which has been the better investment, PWR or SMEGF?

Over the past 5-year, SMEGF delivered the higher annualized total return — PWR at 40.90% versus SMEGF at 45.66%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR) vs Siemens Energy AG (SMEGF)

SMEGF leads on 13 of 16 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Quanta Services, Inc. and Siemens Energy AG across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 19, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

PWR

Quanta Services, Inc.

Total return — PWR vs SMEGF

growth of $100 · last 6y

PWR +1134.2%SMEGF +665.1%PWR compounded faster

PWR SMEGF

PWR vs SMEGF: by the numbers

•SMEGF is the larger company ($167.76B vs $105.38B market cap).
•SMEGF trades at the lower earnings multiple (65.80 vs 96.33 P/E).
•SMEGF converts more revenue to profit (6.15% vs 3.72% net margin).
•PWR grew revenue faster over the past five years (21.91% vs 7.98% CAGR).
•SMEGF pays the higher dividend yield (0.42% vs 0.06%).

Which is better, PWR or SMEGF?

Metric tally: PWR 3 · SMEGF 13

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueSMEGF(lower P/E)

GrowthPWR(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualitySMEGF(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	PWR	SMEGF
P/E ratio	96.33	65.80●
Forward P/E	42.86	32.61●
P/S ratio	3.56	3.63
P/B ratio	11.81●	13.69
PEG ratio	5.40	1.32●
EV / EBITDA	46.89	29.43●
FCF yield	1.57%	4.18%●

Profitability

Metric	PWR	SMEGF
Gross margin	13.59%	18.82%●
Operating margin	5.76%	7.96%●
Net margin	3.72%	6.15%●
ROE	12.33%	23.20%●
ROIC	7.07%	9.12%●

Dividends

Metric	PWR	SMEGF
Dividend yield	0.06%	0.42%●
Payout ratio	6.11%	36.48%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	PWR	SMEGF
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	21.91%●	7.98%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	16.88%	45.13%●
FCF CAGR (5Y)	17.91%	47.34%●
Total return CAGR (5Y)	52.49%●	45.66%

Frequently asked

Which is better, PWR or SMEGF?: It depends on your goal. value: SMEGF (lower P/E); growth: PWR (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: SMEGF (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, SMEGF leads 13 to 3.
Is PWR or SMEGF cheaper?: On trailing earnings, SMEGF is cheaper: PWR trades at a 96.33 P/E and SMEGF at 65.80.
Which has grown faster, PWR or SMEGF?: Over the past five years, PWR grew revenue faster — PWR at a 21.91% CAGR versus SMEGF at 7.98%.
Does PWR or SMEGF pay a bigger dividend?: PWR yields 0.06% and SMEGF yields 0.42% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is PWR or SMEGF more profitable?: SMEGF runs the higher net margin — PWR at 3.72% versus SMEGF at 6.15%.
Which has been the better investment, PWR or SMEGF?: Over the past 5-year, SMEGF delivered the higher annualized total return — PWR at 40.90% versus SMEGF at 45.66%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full PWR analysis Full SMEGF analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Quanta Services P/E ratio Siemens Energy AG P/E ratio Quanta Services dividend yield Siemens Energy AG dividend yield Quanta Services ROE Siemens Energy AG ROE Quanta Services operating margin Siemens Energy AG operating margin Quanta Services revenue growth Siemens Energy AG revenue growth Quanta Services free cash flow Siemens Energy AG free cash flow

Quanta Services & Siemens Energy AG appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Best 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 19, 2026.