Powell Industries, Inc. (POWL) vs Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. (SWK)
POWL and SWK are evenly matched — 8 metrics each of 16.
A side-by-side comparison of Powell Industries, Inc. and Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 13, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
POWL
Powell Industries, Inc.
$294.75Industrials
SWK
Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.
$83.62Industrials
Not enough overlapping price history to compare POWL and SWK.
POWL vs SWK: by the numbers
- •SWK is the larger company ($13.00B vs $10.74B market cap).
- •SWK trades at the lower earnings multiple (34.27 vs 57.61 P/E).
- •POWL converts more revenue to profit (16.51% vs 2.44% net margin).
- •POWL grew revenue faster over the past five years (19.84% vs 0.68% CAGR).
- •SWK pays the higher dividend yield (3.97% vs 0.12%).
Which is better, POWL or SWK?
Metric tally: POWL 8 · SWK 8It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueSWK(lower P/E)
GrowthPOWL(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeSWK(higher dividend yield)
QualityPOWL(higher ROIC)
Valuation
| Metric | POWL | SWK |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 57.61 | 34.27● |
| Forward P/E | 44.88 | 15.62● |
| P/S ratio | 9.51 | 0.84● |
| P/B ratio | 15.19 | 1.42● |
| PEG ratio | 1.03 | 0.82● |
| EV / EBITDA | 41.17 | 15.04● |
| FCF yield | 1.79% | 5.69%● |
Profitability
| Metric | POWL | SWK |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 30.10% | 30.03% |
| Operating margin | 19.76%● | 7.79% |
| Net margin | 16.51%● | 2.44% |
| ROE | 26.36%● | 4.13% |
| ROIC | 25.41%● | 7.21% |
Dividends
| Metric | POWL | SWK |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.12% | 3.97%● |
| Payout ratio | 7.18% | 125.28% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | POWL | SWK |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 19.84%● | 0.68% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 59.98%● | -19.52% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 34.56%● | -17.64% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 99.30%● | -13.22% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, POWL or SWK?
- It depends on your goal. value: SWK (lower P/E); growth: POWL (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: SWK (higher dividend yield); quality: POWL (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, they are evenly matched.
- Is POWL or SWK cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, SWK is cheaper: POWL trades at a 57.61 P/E and SWK at 34.27.
- Which has grown faster, POWL or SWK?
- Over the past five years, POWL grew revenue faster — POWL at a 19.84% CAGR versus SWK at 0.68%.
- Does POWL or SWK pay a bigger dividend?
- POWL yields 0.12% and SWK yields 3.97% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is POWL or SWK more profitable?
- POWL runs the higher net margin — POWL at 16.51% versus SWK at 2.44%.
- Which has been the better investment, POWL or SWK?
- Over the past 10-year, POWL delivered the higher annualized total return — POWL at 47.08% versus SWK at -0.31%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Powell Industries P/E ratioStanley Black & Decker P/E ratioPowell Industries dividend yieldStanley Black & Decker dividend yieldPowell Industries ROEStanley Black & Decker ROEPowell Industries operating marginStanley Black & Decker operating marginPowell Industries revenue growthStanley Black & Decker revenue growthPowell Industries free cash flowStanley Black & Decker free cash flow
Powell Industries & Stanley Black & Decker appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 13, 2026.