Powell Industries, Inc. (POWL) vs Silicon Motion Technology Corporation (SIMO)
POWL leads on 9 of 17 compared metrics, though SIMO is the cheaper stock.
A side-by-side comparison of Powell Industries, Inc. and Silicon Motion Technology Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 13, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
POWL
Powell Industries, Inc.
$294.75Industrials
SIMO
Silicon Motion Technology Corporation
$280.49Technology
Not enough overlapping price history to compare POWL and SIMO.
POWL vs SIMO: by the numbers
- •POWL is the larger company ($10.74B vs $9.41B market cap).
- •SIMO trades at the lower earnings multiple (21.85 vs 57.61 P/E).
- •POWL converts more revenue to profit (16.51% vs 16.02% net margin).
- •POWL grew revenue faster over the past five years (19.84% vs 12.49% CAGR).
- •SIMO pays the higher dividend yield (0.71% vs 0.12%).
Which is better, POWL or SIMO?
Metric tally: POWL 9 · SIMO 8It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueSIMO(lower P/E)
GrowthPOWL(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeSIMO(higher dividend yield)
QualityPOWL(higher ROIC)
Valuation
| Metric | POWL | SIMO |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 57.61 | 21.85● |
| Forward P/E | 44.88 | 32.07● |
| P/S ratio | 9.51 | 2.66● |
| P/B ratio | 15.19 | 2.84● |
| PEG ratio | 1.03 | 0.17● |
| EV / EBITDA | 41.17 | 12.65● |
| FCF yield | 1.79%● | 0.27% |
Profitability
| Metric | POWL | SIMO |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 30.10% | 48.09%● |
| Operating margin | 19.76%● | 12.77% |
| Net margin | 16.51%● | 16.02% |
| ROE | 26.36%● | 18.76% |
| ROIC | 25.41%● | 9.22% |
Dividends
| Metric | POWL | SIMO |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.12% | 0.71%● |
| Payout ratio | 7.18% | 13.70% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | POWL | SIMO |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 19.84%● | 12.49% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 59.98%● | 44.85% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 34.56%● | -42.00% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 99.30%● | 37.00% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, POWL or SIMO?
- It depends on your goal. value: SIMO (lower P/E); growth: POWL (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: SIMO (higher dividend yield); quality: POWL (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, POWL leads 9 to 8.
- Is POWL or SIMO cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, SIMO is cheaper: POWL trades at a 57.61 P/E and SIMO at 21.85.
- Which has grown faster, POWL or SIMO?
- Over the past five years, POWL grew revenue faster — POWL at a 19.84% CAGR versus SIMO at 12.49%.
- Does POWL or SIMO pay a bigger dividend?
- POWL yields 0.12% and SIMO yields 0.71% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is POWL or SIMO more profitable?
- POWL runs the higher net margin — POWL at 16.51% versus SIMO at 16.02%.
- Which has been the better investment, POWL or SIMO?
- Over the past 10-year, POWL delivered the higher annualized total return — POWL at 47.08% versus SIMO at 23.11%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Powell Industries P/E ratioSilicon Motion Technology P/E ratioPowell Industries dividend yieldSilicon Motion Technology dividend yieldPowell Industries ROESilicon Motion Technology ROEPowell Industries operating marginSilicon Motion Technology operating marginPowell Industries revenue growthSilicon Motion Technology revenue growthPowell Industries free cash flowSilicon Motion Technology free cash flow
Powell Industries & Silicon Motion Technology appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 13, 2026.