Which has grown faster, PL or SWK?

Over the past five years, PL grew revenue faster — PL at a 22.15% CAGR versus SWK at 0.68%.

Does PL or SWK pay a bigger dividend?

SWK pays a dividend (3.97% yield) while PL does not currently pay one.

Is PL or SWK more profitable?

SWK runs the higher net margin — PL at -111.17% versus SWK at 2.44%.

Which has been the better investment, PL or SWK?

Over the past 5-year, PL delivered the higher annualized total return — PL at 25.62% versus SWK at -0.31%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Planet Labs PBC (PL) vs Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. (SWK)

SWK leads on 7 of 10 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Planet Labs PBC and Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 14, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.

$13.00B

$83.62Industrials

Total return — PL vs SWK

growth of $100 · last 5y

PL +214.6%SWK -60.0%PL compounded faster

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

PL SWK

PL vs SWK: by the numbers

•SWK is the larger company ($13.00B vs $10.37B market cap).
•SWK is profitable (2.44% net margin) while PL runs a net loss (-111.17%).
•PL grew revenue faster over the past five years (22.15% vs 0.68% CAGR).
•SWK pays a dividend (3.97% yield) while PL does not currently pay one.

Which is better, PL or SWK?

Metric tally: PL 3 · SWK 7

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

GrowthPL(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualitySWK(higher ROIC)

Valuation

Metric	PL	SWK
P/E ratio	—	34.27
Forward P/E	—	15.62
P/S ratio	32.07	0.84●
P/B ratio	24.26	1.42●
PEG ratio	—	0.82
EV / EBITDA	—	15.04
FCF yield	0.44%	5.69%●

Profitability

Metric	PL	SWK
Gross margin	55.51%●	30.03%
Operating margin	-31.94%	7.79%●
Net margin	-111.17%	2.44%●
ROE	-84.09%	4.13%●
ROIC	-13.91%	7.21%●

Dividends

Metric	PL	SWK
Dividend yield	—	3.97%
Payout ratio	—	125.28%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	PL	SWK
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	22.15%●	0.68%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	—	-19.52%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	—	-17.64%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	25.62%●	-13.22%

Frequently asked

Which is better, PL or SWK?: It depends on your goal. growth: PL (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: SWK (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, SWK leads 7 to 3.
Which has grown faster, PL or SWK?: Over the past five years, PL grew revenue faster — PL at a 22.15% CAGR versus SWK at 0.68%.
Does PL or SWK pay a bigger dividend?: SWK pays a dividend (3.97% yield) while PL does not currently pay one.
Is PL or SWK more profitable?: SWK runs the higher net margin — PL at -111.17% versus SWK at 2.44%.
Which has been the better investment, PL or SWK?: Over the past 5-year, PL delivered the higher annualized total return — PL at 25.62% versus SWK at -0.31%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full PL analysis Full SWK analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Planet Labs PBC P/E ratio Stanley Black & Decker P/E ratio Planet Labs PBC dividend yield Stanley Black & Decker dividend yield Planet Labs PBC ROE Stanley Black & Decker ROE Planet Labs PBC operating margin Stanley Black & Decker operating margin Planet Labs PBC revenue growth Stanley Black & Decker revenue growth Planet Labs PBC free cash flow Stanley Black & Decker free cash flow

Planet Labs PBC & Stanley Black & Decker appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Dividend Aristocrats Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 14, 2026.