Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH) vs RTX Corporation (RTX)
PH leads on 9 of 17 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Parker-Hannifin Corporation and RTX Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 14, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
Total return — PH vs RTX
growth of $100 · last 30yPH +4872.4%RTX +2146.4%PH compounded faster
PH RTX
PH vs RTX: by the numbers
- •RTX is the larger company ($247.16B vs $113.92B market cap).
- •PH trades at the lower earnings multiple (33.34 vs 34.43 P/E).
- •PH converts more revenue to profit (16.58% vs 8.03% net margin).
- •PH grew revenue faster over the past five years (9.15% vs 8.37% CAGR).
- •RTX pays the higher dividend yield (1.51% vs 0.82%).
Which is better, PH or RTX?
Metric tally: PH 9 · RTX 8It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValuePH(lower P/E)
GrowthPH(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeRTX(higher dividend yield)
QualityPH(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | PH | RTX |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 33.34● | 34.43 |
| Forward P/E | 26.53 | 24.07● |
| P/S ratio | 5.51 | 2.77● |
| P/B ratio | 7.92 | 3.78● |
| PEG ratio | 1.04 | 0.91● |
| EV / EBITDA | 22.16 | 18.31● |
| FCF yield | 3.18% | 3.34%● |
Profitability
| Metric | PH | RTX |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 37.23%● | 20.21% |
| Operating margin | 20.87%● | 10.87% |
| Net margin | 16.58%● | 8.03% |
| ROE | 23.82%● | 10.95% |
| ROIC | 13.69%● | 6.49% |
Dividends
| Metric | PH | RTX |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.82% | 1.51%● |
| Payout ratio | 26.89% | 55.18% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | PH | RTX |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 9.15%● | 8.37% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 24.00%● | -4.16% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 8.25% | 37.83%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 26.11%● | 18.19% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, PH or RTX?
- It depends on your goal. value: PH (lower P/E); growth: PH (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: RTX (higher dividend yield); quality: PH (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, PH leads 9 to 8.
- Is PH or RTX cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, PH is cheaper: PH trades at a 33.34 P/E and RTX at 34.43.
- Which has grown faster, PH or RTX?
- Over the past five years, PH grew revenue faster — PH at a 9.15% CAGR versus RTX at 8.37%.
- Does PH or RTX pay a bigger dividend?
- PH yields 0.82% and RTX yields 1.51% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is PH or RTX more profitable?
- PH runs the higher net margin — PH at 16.58% versus RTX at 8.03%.
- Which has been the better investment, PH or RTX?
- Over the past 10-year, PH delivered the higher annualized total return — PH at 25.01% versus RTX at 14.46%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Parker-Hannifin P/E ratioRTX P/E ratioParker-Hannifin dividend yieldRTX dividend yieldParker-Hannifin ROERTX ROEParker-Hannifin operating marginRTX operating marginParker-Hannifin revenue growthRTX revenue growthParker-Hannifin free cash flowRTX free cash flow
Parker-Hannifin & RTX appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 14, 2026.