Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (PANW) vs Powell Industries, Inc. (POWL)
POWL leads on 11 of 16 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Powell Industries, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 13, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
PANW
Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
$279.62Technology
POWL
Powell Industries, Inc.
$294.75Industrials
Total return — PANW vs POWL
growth of $100 · last 14yPANW +3059.5%POWL +2316.0%PANW compounded faster
PANW POWL
PANW vs POWL: by the numbers
- •PANW is the larger company ($190.56B vs $10.74B market cap).
- •POWL trades at the lower earnings multiple (57.61 vs 243.15 P/E).
- •POWL converts more revenue to profit (16.51% vs 7.95% net margin).
- •PANW grew revenue faster over the past five years (21.62% vs 19.84% CAGR).
- •POWL pays a dividend (0.12% yield) while PANW does not currently pay one.
Which is better, PANW or POWL?
Metric tally: PANW 5 · POWL 11It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValuePOWL(lower P/E)
GrowthPANW(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityPOWL(higher ROIC)
Valuation
| Metric | PANW | POWL |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 243.15 | 57.61● |
| Forward P/E | 68.62 | 44.88● |
| P/S ratio | 19.61 | 9.51● |
| P/B ratio | 7.52● | 15.19 |
| PEG ratio | 3.50 | 1.03● |
| EV / EBITDA | 117.46 | 41.17● |
| FCF yield | 2.06%● | 1.79% |
Profitability
| Metric | PANW | POWL |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 71.94%● | 30.10% |
| Operating margin | 9.65% | 19.76%● |
| Net margin | 7.95% | 16.51%● |
| ROE | 3.05% | 26.36%● |
| ROIC | 5.67% | 25.41%● |
Dividends
| Metric | PANW | POWL |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | — | 0.12% |
| Payout ratio | — | 7.18% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | PANW | POWL |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 21.62%● | 19.84% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 69.46%● | 59.98% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 25.30% | 34.56%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 35.59% | 99.30%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, PANW or POWL?
- It depends on your goal. value: POWL (lower P/E); growth: PANW (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: POWL (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, POWL leads 11 to 5.
- Is PANW or POWL cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, POWL is cheaper: PANW trades at a 243.15 P/E and POWL at 57.61.
- Which has grown faster, PANW or POWL?
- Over the past five years, PANW grew revenue faster — PANW at a 21.62% CAGR versus POWL at 19.84%.
- Does PANW or POWL pay a bigger dividend?
- POWL pays a dividend (0.12% yield) while PANW does not currently pay one.
- Is PANW or POWL more profitable?
- POWL runs the higher net margin — PANW at 7.95% versus POWL at 16.51%.
- Which has been the better investment, PANW or POWL?
- Over the past 10-year, POWL delivered the higher annualized total return — PANW at 29.01% versus POWL at 47.08%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Palo Alto Networks P/E ratioPowell Industries P/E ratioPalo Alto Networks dividend yieldPowell Industries dividend yieldPalo Alto Networks ROEPowell Industries ROEPalo Alto Networks operating marginPowell Industries operating marginPalo Alto Networks revenue growthPowell Industries revenue growthPalo Alto Networks free cash flowPowell Industries free cash flow
Palo Alto Networks & Powell Industries appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 13, 2026.