Everpure, Inc. (P) vs Snap-on Incorporated (SNA)
SNA leads on 10 of 14 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Everpure, Inc. and Snap-on Incorporated across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 26, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
Total return — P vs SNA
growth of $100 · last 11yP +321.6%SNA +158.4%P compounded faster
P SNA
P vs SNA: by the numbers
- •P is the larger company ($23.83B vs $20.77B market cap).
- •SNA trades at the lower earnings multiple (20.71 vs 108.61 P/E).
- •SNA converts more revenue to profit (19.99% vs 5.75% net margin).
- •P grew revenue faster over the past five years (17.87% vs 5.87% CAGR).
- •SNA pays a dividend (2.36% yield) while P does not currently pay one.
Which is better, P or SNA?
Metric tally: P 4 · SNA 10It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueSNA(lower P/E)
GrowthP(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualitySNA(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | P | SNA |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 108.61 | 20.71● |
| Forward P/E | — | 20.98 |
| P/S ratio | 5.94 | 4.13● |
| P/B ratio | 16.23 | 3.55● |
| PEG ratio | 2.96 | 1.87● |
| EV / EBITDA | 55.32 | 13.82● |
| FCF yield | 0.67% | 5.10%● |
Profitability
| Metric | P | SNA |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 70.23%● | 51.30% |
| Operating margin | 4.21% | 24.71%● |
| Net margin | 5.75% | 19.99%● |
| ROE | 15.69% | 17.18%● |
| ROIC | 3.43% | 13.79%● |
Dividends
| Metric | P | SNA |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | — | 2.36% |
| Payout ratio | — | 48.46% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | P | SNA |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 17.87%● | 5.87% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | — | 11.05% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 15.82%● | 0.58% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 29.09%● | 15.53% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, P or SNA?
- It depends on your goal. value: SNA (lower P/E); growth: P (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: SNA (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, SNA leads 10 to 4.
- Is P or SNA cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, SNA is cheaper: P trades at a 108.61 P/E and SNA at 20.71.
- Which has grown faster, P or SNA?
- Over the past five years, P grew revenue faster — P at a 17.87% CAGR versus SNA at 5.87%.
- Does P or SNA pay a bigger dividend?
- SNA pays a dividend (2.36% yield) while P does not currently pay one.
- Is P or SNA more profitable?
- SNA runs the higher net margin — P at 5.75% versus SNA at 19.99%.
- Which has been the better investment, P or SNA?
- Over the past 10-year, P delivered the higher annualized total return — P at 21.59% versus SNA at 13.03%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Everpure P/E ratioSnap-on P/E ratioEverpure dividend yieldSnap-on dividend yieldEverpure ROESnap-on ROEEverpure operating marginSnap-on operating marginEverpure revenue growthSnap-on revenue growthEverpure free cash flowSnap-on free cash flow
Everpure & Snap-on appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 26, 2026.