ON Semiconductor Corporation (ON) vs Roper Technologies, Inc. (ROP)
ROP leads on 12 of 15 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of ON Semiconductor Corporation and Roper Technologies, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 26, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
ON
ON Semiconductor Corporation
$118.74Technology
ROP
Roper Technologies, Inc.
$332.42Technology
Total return — ON vs ROP
growth of $100 · last 26yON +276.7%ROP +1924.7%ROP compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
ON ROP
ON vs ROP: by the numbers
- •ON is the larger company ($35.44B vs $34.24B market cap).
- •ROP trades at the lower earnings multiple (20.76 vs 84.21 P/E).
- •ROP converts more revenue to profit (21.12% vs 9.46% net margin).
- •ROP grew revenue faster over the past five years (9.25% vs 2.12% CAGR).
- •ROP pays a dividend (1.10% yield) while ON does not currently pay one.
Which is better, ON or ROP?
Metric tally: ON 3 · ROP 12It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueROP(lower P/E)
GrowthROP(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityON(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | ON | ROP |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 84.21 | 20.76● |
| Forward P/E | 38.32 | 15.17● |
| P/S ratio | 7.72 | 4.28● |
| P/B ratio | 6.41 | 1.85● |
| PEG ratio | — | 2.18 |
| EV / EBITDA | 40.31 | 13.20● |
| FCF yield | 3.11% | 7.34%● |
Profitability
| Metric | ON | ROP |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 37.22% | 69.40%● |
| Operating margin | 10.84% | 28.09%● |
| Net margin | 9.46% | 21.12%● |
| ROE | 7.86% | 9.11%● |
| ROIC | 6.24%● | 5.62% |
Dividends
| Metric | ON | ROP |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | — | 1.10% |
| Payout ratio | — | 25.44% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | ON | ROP |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 2.12% | 9.25%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -12.64% | 9.53%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 23.39%● | 8.90% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 19.23%● | -5.62% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, ON or ROP?
- It depends on your goal. value: ROP (lower P/E); growth: ROP (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: ON (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, ROP leads 12 to 3.
- Is ON or ROP cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, ROP is cheaper: ON trades at a 84.21 P/E and ROP at 20.76.
- Which has grown faster, ON or ROP?
- Over the past five years, ROP grew revenue faster — ON at a 2.12% CAGR versus ROP at 9.25%.
- Does ON or ROP pay a bigger dividend?
- ROP pays a dividend (1.10% yield) while ON does not currently pay one.
- Is ON or ROP more profitable?
- ROP runs the higher net margin — ON at 9.46% versus ROP at 21.12%.
- Which has been the better investment, ON or ROP?
- Over the past 10-year, ON delivered the higher annualized total return — ON at 25.81% versus ROP at 7.94%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
ON Semiconductor P/E ratioRoper Technologies P/E ratioON Semiconductor dividend yieldRoper Technologies dividend yieldON Semiconductor ROERoper Technologies ROEON Semiconductor operating marginRoper Technologies operating marginON Semiconductor revenue growthRoper Technologies revenue growthON Semiconductor free cash flowRoper Technologies free cash flow
ON Semiconductor & Roper Technologies appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 26, 2026.